Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has condemned President Droupadi Murmu’s request to the Supreme Court regarding timelines for Governor assent on State Bills. He argues it undermines constitutional authority and calls it a tactic to weaken opposition-led governments. The Supreme Court previously ruled against delays by the Tamil Nadu Governor, emphasizing judicial authority.
President Droupadi Murmu has sought the Supreme Court’s opinion on whether judicial review can apply to the President’s and Governors’ actions regarding state assembly Bills, as constitutional timelines are not specified. This inquiry raises significant issues regarding separation of powers and judicial oversight in the democratic process.