On January 2, 2025, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna greeted lawyers and litigants as the Supreme Court resumed after a winter break. He announced that the email system for case mentions was down, instructing lawyers to submit physical letters instead, which would be reviewed for urgent case listings.
Justice Nagarathna believes that the judiciary becomes truly representative when more women are on the bench. She elaborates that this inclusivity aligns with the principles of justice and the Constitution, ensuring diverse perspectives in adjudication. Justice BV Nagarathna, soon to make history as the first woman Chief Justice of India (CJI), shared her thoughts on her journey, her father’s inspiring legacy, and the evolving judicial system in India.
![[Breaking] EVM Verification Plea Should Be Heard by Bench That Delivered April Verdict: Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EVM.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India on Friday (13th Dec) suggested that a petition regarding electronic voting machines (EVM) verification be referred to the same bench that ruled in April 2024, affirming EVM security. Petitioners seek to establish a clear verification protocol, requesting the Election Commission to verify EVM components within eight weeks without disputing election results.
The Supreme Court, On Friday (6th Dec) in rejecting a PIL aimed at preventing active political party members from contesting bar body elections, emphasized that diverse ideologies must conform to the Constitution. The court stated no law bars such candidacy and highlighted individual freedom and responsibilities in professional roles, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the plea.
The Supreme Court cautioned the Registrar to ensure diligence among assistants, due to a missing order and critical report in a case file. Despite the registrar’s conclusion, the court noted the absence of an official report and directed the Registry to submit a report within a week, setting the case for re-listing in ten days.
![[Manipur Violence] "Court Has to Go by the Law Not by Sentiment": SC Refused to Entertain Contempt Petition](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-131-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court dismissed today, a contempt petition against Manipur authorities for failing to protect the properties of displaced persons during recent violence. The court stated that no contempt was made, emphasizing the need to involve encroachers as parties to the case before taking action. Encroachments on properties should be addressed through separate proceedings.
Today(on 8th May), The Uttarakhand High Court is considering relocating a bench to the IDPL campus in Rishikesh following a PIL against ex-employees’ residency. The bar association opposes the move, citing no substantial benefit. The court has requested a written proposal, reflecting a commitment to considering all viewpoints before making a decision with significant implications.
On wednesday (6th of March): The Kerala High Court emphasized that being appointed as an advocate commissioner is an honor, not simply a commercial endeavor. The court criticized a young lawyer’s misconception that the role was purely for monetary gain. It stressed the need for the bar and the bench to guide and nurture young legal professionals for the integrity of the legal system.