Today, On 9th December, AAP Legal Cell Chief Sanjeev Nasiar challenged the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) decision to suspend him as Vice Chairman due to questions about his LL.B. degree authenticity. The BCI has sought a CBI investigation into alleged record tampering, raising legal and political concerns about Nasiar’s qualifications.
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court decided to review a video of the Delhi High Court Bar Association meeting where a women’s quota proposal was rejected. The Court questioned the lack of constitutional discussions during the rejection process. The matter is adjourned until November 18, focusing on the decision-making process regarding women’s representation.
![[One Member, One Post Rule] "No Member Shall Hold or Contest Posts in Two Different Associations": SC Issues Notice on Delhi Bar Associations' Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-71-3.png?resize=318%2C159&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court issued a notice regarding a plea challenging the “one member, one post” rule for Delhi bar associations, which was upheld by the Delhi High Court. The rule mandates that all bar association elections in Delhi be conducted simultaneously and prohibits lawyers from contesting or holding multiple posts across different bar bodies. The next hearing is scheduled for September 9.
On Monday(12th August), the Delhi High Court concluded proceedings on a petition challenging the authenticity of AAP legal cell president Sanjeev Nasiar’s law degree, following a verification report from Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya affirming its authenticity. The petition, filed by Naresh Chandra Gupta, also accused another advocate, Dilip Kumar Rana, of holding a fake law degree.
The Supreme Court today questioned the Delhi High Court’s involvement in deciding the main bar body for the Rouse Avenue District Court. The High Court’s recognition of the Central Delhi Court Bar Association was disputed by other bar associations. The Supreme Court issued notice on the appeal and scheduled further consideration after four weeks.
The Bar Council of Delhi has resumed enrollment for aspiring lawyers following a recent Supreme Court ruling. Enrollment fees have been set at Rs 750 for the general category and Rs 125 for SC/ST applicants, in accordance with the Advocates Act. This decision aims to streamline the enrollment process and make the legal profession more accessible.
Today, On 5th August, The Delhi High Court requested responses from bar associations concerning a plea for reservations for women lawyers in leadership roles within the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA). Advocate Fozia Rahman emphasized the lack of gender diversity in decision-making positions and the plea aims to address this imbalance by reserving specific roles for women.
New criminal laws effective since July 1 challenge Delhi’s veteran lawyers to relearn legal sections they have known for decades, under the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Section numbers have changed, requiring significant effort and adaptation. Concerns arise regarding increased police power and limitations on freedom of expression. The impact on the judicial system and legal practice in India is unfolding.
Today(on 18th July),The Delhi High Court issued notices to several Bar Associations, including the BCI, BCD, DHCBA, and district courts’ Bar Associations, following a plea for 33% reservation for women lawyers in upcoming elections. The plea highlights the lack of female representation in leadership positions and the burden placed on young women lawyers. The detailed hearing is scheduled for August 12.