![[Chhattisgarh Coal Levy Scam] SC Grants ED More Time to File Reply in IAS Ranu Sahu's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-15-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today granted the Enforcement Directorate (ED) additional time to respond to suspended bureaucrat Ranu Sahu’s bail request in the Chhattisgarh Coal Levy Scam case. Sahu, facing charges related to misusing her position for personal gain, awaits the ED’s comprehensive reply as the hearing is rescheduled for next week.
![[Excise Policy CBI Case] Delhi Court Orders Medical Check-Up for BRS Leader K Kavitha at AIIMS](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (28th May): The CBI and ED opposed BRS leader K Kavitha’s bail plea, citing concerns about evidence tampering and witness influence in the Delhi excise policy case. Kavitha’s counsel argued for her release, emphasizing cooperation and innocence. The case involves alleged irregularities in the modification of the excise policy, resulting in a purported loss to the exchequer.
![[Swati Maliwal Assault case] Delhi Court Rejects the CM Arvind Kejriwal's aide, Bibhav Kumar's Bail Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ipmqr368_swati-maliwal.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted temporary relief to Ramakrishna Reddy, MLA of the YSR Congress Party, until June 5 in a case involving the destruction of an EVM. The court ordered the police not to arrest him and imposed conditions, including monitoring by the Election Commission. Tension in Macherla led to TDP leaders’ house arrests.
![[Excise 'Scam'] Delhi HC Issues Notice Over Manish Sisodia’s Plea Challenging ED's Charge Sheet Over Lack Of Sanction](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-6-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court denied bail to Manish Sisodia, citing serious charges and the risk of evidence tampering related to alleged irregularities in Delhi’s liquor policy. The Court emphasized the strong case of money laundering and Sisodia’s influential position, rejecting his plea for bail in the CBI and ED cases. Sisodia’s previous bail applications had also been denied.
The Delhi court on Monday extended Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha’s judicial custody in the Delhi excise policy case until June 3. Her lawyer argued that since the chargesheet was filed and cognizance not yet taken by the court, she should be released. The Enforcement Directorate alleges a criminal conspiracy involving AAP leaders. bail plea hearing on May 24.
Today(on 20th May), The Supreme Court rejected bail for ex-Samajwadi Party legislator Kamlesh Pathak under Uttar Pradesh’s Gangster Act due to his extensive criminal record. Justices Dipankar Datta and Satish C Sharma emphasized his influence in the region and the severity of the charges. Pathak’s previous bail grants in murder cases did not apply to the Gangster Act charges.
Today (16th May): The Supreme Court postponed urban Naxal Jyoti Jagtap’s bail plea hearing in the Bhima Koregaon case to July, citing the summer recess. Initially set for May, the hearing was rescheduled for July 8. Jagtap remains in custody following the Bombay High Court’s previous denial of bail. The case involves alleged incitement to violence during the 2018 Bhima Koregaon event.
![[Breaking] Delhi Court Extends Manish Sisodia's Judicial Custody till May 30 in Excise policy Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-167.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (15th May): Manish Sisodia, Aam Aadmi Party leader, faces extended judicial custody until May 30 in the Delhi excise policy case. The framing of charges against him has been adjourned based on Delhi High Court’s directions. He was arrested last year by the ED in connection with alleged money laundering and corruption linked to the liquor policy.
Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.