[Excise Policy Case] Delhi HC Seeks CBI Response on Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Plea

The Delhi High Court has requested the CBI’s response to Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea related to a corruption case. Kejriwal was arrested in connection to the excise policy ‘scam’ and the court has set July 17 as the next hearing date. The case involves allegations of irregularities and corruption in the excise policy.

Delhi High Court to Hear Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Plea in Excise Policy Scam on July 5

Today(on 3rd July), The Delhi High Court announced that it would hear Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea seeking bail in the corruption case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the alleged excise policy scam on July 5.

“One day Majority Population would become Minority if Conversions at Religious gatherings continued”: HC

The Allahabad High Court rejected a bail plea under the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, expressing concern that continued religious conversions could lead to the majority population becoming a minority. The court emphasized that while the Indian Constitution guarantees religious freedom, it doesn’t permit forced conversions. The accused’s bail was denied.

Excise ‘Scam’ Case | Delhi High Court Rejects Bail Plea of BRS Leader K Kavitha in CBI and ED Matters

Today(on 1st July), Delhi High Court denies bail to BRS leader K Kavitha in CBI and ED cases linked to 2021-22 Delhi Excise Policy. Kavitha faces allegations of bribery and money laundering related to the policy, with connections to the Aam Aadmi Party’s campaign funding. The case involves other political figures, including the Delhi Chief Minister, implicating broader political ramifications.

[Bhusan Steel Bank Fraud Case] SC Seeks ED’s Response of Ex-Promoter Singal’s Bail Plea Within Three weeks

The Supreme Court has agreed to consider Neeraj Singal’s bail plea in the Bhushan Steel bank fraud case. Singal, the former promoter of Bhushan Steel, is seeking bail after being accused of involvement in a money laundering case linked to an alleged Rs 46,000 crore bank fraud. The Enforcement Directorate has been requested to respond within three weeks.

Satyendar Jain Bail Plea | Supreme Court to Delhi HC: “Don’t Adjourn Unnecessarily”

The Supreme Court Today (June 25th) said that bail matters should not be adjourned unnecessarily. A Bench of Justices Manoj Misra and SVN Bhatti, therefore, called upon the Delhi High Court to decide the bail plea filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyendar Jain without delay.

ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail, Calls Court Order ‘Illegal, Perverse’

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposes Arvind Kejriwal’s bail, claiming the trial court’s decision was illegal. They allege Kejriwal’s deep involvement in money laundering and the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) benefit from illicit funds. The ED also criticizes the judge for disregarding Kejriwal’s role in the money laundering case. Kejriwal has appealed to the Supreme Court for bail.

[BREAKING] Delhi Court Reserves Order on Arvind Kejriwal Bail Plea | ED Shows Concrete Evidence Against AAP

Today(on 20th June), A Delhi court has reserved its order on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in a money laundering case. The Enforcement Directorate cited evidence of cash transfers to Aam Aadmi Party and Kejriwal’s hotel bills. The court was presented with documents and telephone records to support the case. The judge urged for a prompt resolution.

‘Will Pass The Order Immediately After Hearing on Arvind Kejriwal Bail Plea, Will Not Reserve Order’ : Delhi HC

Today(on 19th June), A Delhi Court will decide on Arvind Kejriwal’s bail plea in the excise policy case immediately after hearing arguments, with Judge Nyay Bindu stating she will not reserve the order due to its high-profile nature. The court adjourned today’s session to Thursday to finalize pending orders and provide necessary copies.

Russia-Ukraine War| Delhi Court Denies Bail to Man Accused of Trafficking Indians

A Delhi court denied bail to a man accused of trafficking Indian citizens to Russia for forced participation in the conflict with Ukraine. The accused’s plea was rejected due to serious allegations and concerns about potential evidence tampering. The man maintained his innocence, claiming to be a victim of the trafficking racket. He remains in custody.