Supreme Court: ‘High Courts Must Show Courage’: Bail Granted to Maulvi Accused of ‘Illegally’ Converting Minor

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has granted bail to a madrasa teacher, Maulvi Syed Shad Kazmi, who the Uttar Pradesh government accused of ‘illegally’ converting a minor boy to Islam. The court observed that the charges against him were not as severe as crimes like murder, dacoity, or rape.

Kerala High Court: Magic Mushrooms Are Fungi, Not Narcotic Substances

The Kerala High Court ruled that magic mushrooms are not classified as narcotic drugs under the NDPS Act, impacting bail decisions for drug possession cases. The Court clarified that the mushrooms, containing minimal psilocybin, cannot be treated as mixtures. Consequently, the accused’s total weight of possession did not exceed the commercial quantity threshold, allowing bail.

Bengaluru Techie Atul Subhash Suicide Case: Supreme Court Hearing on Grandson’s Custody On Jan 20

The Supreme Court will revisit the custody plea of Anju Devi for her grandson following the death of her son, Atul Subhash. Despite a previous denial, the court has directed the child be presented on January 20. Concerns arise over the boy’s welfare amid allegations against his mother, Nikita Singhania.

AAP MP Sanjay Singh’s Case| ‘Charges Could Not Be Framed Due to Absence’: UP MP-MLA Court

Sultanpur (Uttar Pradesh), January 9: In a case related to the violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC), charges could not be framed against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh on Thursday as he was absent in court. The case is being heard in the MP/MLA court in Sultanpur.

[Breaking] Excise Policy Case: SC Deleted Bail Condition Requiring Manish Sisodia To Appear Before ED On Every Monday & Thursday

The Supreme Court of India today (11th Dec) has relieved Aam Aadmi Party leader Manish Sisodia by removing a bail condition that required him to report to investigators twice weekly in the Delhi Excise Policy case. Sisodia’s bail was originally granted in August 2024, amid allegations of corruption related to the excise policy.

[Delhi Riots Case] HC Issues Notice to Delhi Police After Devangana Kalita Moves Against Case Diary ‘Tampering’

Devangana Kalita has petitioned the Delhi High Court for the preservation and reconstruction of her case diary, alleging police tampering with evidence in the 2020 Delhi riots case. The High Court has instructed the Delhi Police to submit a status report, with the next hearing set for November 25. Kalita was previously released on bail after multiple arrests related to the riots.

[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] “Fails to Exercise Judicial Discretion, Issues Mechanical Order”: Bibhav Kumar Challenges Delhi Court’s Cognizance of Chargesheet

Bibhav Kumar, charged with assaulting Swati Maliwal, has contested the court’s cognizance of the chargesheet, claiming procedural errors under the Bharat Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. His revision petition is pending at Tis Hazari Court, with arguments citing adherence to old procedures instead of the new law. The case continues to be judicially reviewed.

Addl. District Magistrate Naveen Babu Suicide Case| Kerala Court Grants Bail to PP Divya

The Thalassery Sessions Court granted regular bail to PP Divya, who is accused of abetting the suicide of ADM Naveen Babu. Babu was found dead following a farewell ceremony, where Divya suggested his involvement in bribery. Despite initial denial of anticipatory bail, her regular bail request has been accepted.

Court Grants Bail to Shiv Sena (UBT) Leader Sanjay Raut in Defamation Case Filed By BJP Leader Kirit Somaiya’s Wife

Mumbai’s sessions court granted bail to Sanjay Raut, a Rajya Sabha MP, in a defamation case filed by Kirit Somaiya’s wife. Raut, convicted of defamation and sentenced to 15 days in prison, challenged the verdict, claiming it was flawed. Bail was approved upon a Rs 50,000 bond after his personal appeal.

Teenage Love And Related Offences Fall In “Legal Grey Area”, Can be Debatable If It is Categorized As Offense: Delhi High Court

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court noted that teenage romance and related offenses occupy a “legal grey area,” raising questions about whether such situations should be classified as offenses.