The Supreme Court Today (April 28) declined to hear a fresh plea against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, asking the petitioner to join existing cases. Only five petitions will be considered on May 5 for interim orders.
Asaduddin Owaisi responded to judicial overreach allegations by saying the Supreme Court must examine whether a law violates fundamental rights, freedoms, or the basic structure of the Constitution. He added that such scrutiny is a constitutional responsibility.
The Supreme Court has decided to hear five main petitions challenging the Waqf Amendment Act. It clarified that all other similar petitions filed across the country will be treated as intervention or impleadment applications in these five cases. This move aims to streamline the legal proceedings on the controversial Waqf law.
The Supreme Court of India is reviewing petitions against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, which challenges the de-notification of properties declared as waqf. The court emphasized the importance of preserving existing waqf properties and expressed concerns over controversial provisions in the Amendment Act, indicating a possible interim order to address these issues.
This question struck at the heart of the issue of religious autonomy and raised an important constitutional debate. NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday started hearing a group of petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, recently passed by Parliament. ALSO READ: BREAKING | “Not Considering Stay (of the Act)”: CJI Khanna […]
The Uttarakhand Waqf Board has requested the Supreme Court to join a case challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, supporting the law’s constitutional validity. The Board sees itself as a vital participant due to its role in managing Waqf properties, addressing concerns about property genuineness and illegal encroachments while seeking to assist the court.
Today, On 15th April, The Supreme Court will consider a fresh plea challenging the provisions of the 2025 Waqf Act, with the Chief Justice stating, “We give dates mostly within a week” for cases involving mentioning slips. The petitioners argue the amendments infringe on Muslim religious autonomy and the management of waqf properties.
The Jammu & Kashmir National Conference, led by Farooq Abdullah, is challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, claiming it interferes unconstitutionally in Muslim religious affairs. Multiple petitions cite violations of fundamental rights and seek legal intervention from the Supreme Court, which will hear these cases.
New Delhi: 10th April: Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra has filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, raising serious concerns about how the law was passed and its impact on the fundamental rights of citizens.
The Supreme Court of India will hear ten petitions, including one by MP Asaduddin Owaisi, challenging the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on April 16. This Act introduces significant changes to the management of waqf properties, increasing Central Government authority and altering the criteria for declaring waqf, raising concerns among communities.
