Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi Today criticized the actions of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the case of K Kavitha, accusing them of unfairness and harassment. The advocate argued for bail, stating that Kavitha’s arrest was unnecessary and that the ED reneged on their undertaking to the Supreme Court. The case is scheduled for further hearing on April 4. Kavitha, a leader of Bharat Rashtra Samithi, is accused in the Delhi excise scam case and is currently in judicial custody until April 9, with a plea for interim bail filed.
The Tihar Jail administrator on Sunday informed the court that K Kavitha, a leader of Bharat Rashtra Samithi, cannot have home-cooked meals in prison as directed by the court. Kavitha, daughter of former Telangana CM, alleged non-compliance with the court’s directive. The court emphasized its order to comply with jail regulations and urged the lawyer to gather accurate instructions.
![[Breaking] Delhi Excise Policy Scam: ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail Plea In Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-414.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Enforcement Directorate (ED) has formally contacted Apple, the phone’s manufacturer, seeking access to Arvind Kejriwal’s iPhone. Nevertheless, they were informed that a password was necessary to access any data. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has escalated its investigation involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal by seeking assistance from tech giant Apple. The move aims to unlock […]
The Delhi High Court affirmed High Courts’ authority over tribunal decisions, ruling on a PIL challenging statutes bypassing High Courts and sending appeals directly to the Supreme Court. The Delhi High Court has recently delivered a pivotal judgment affirming the enduring writ jurisdiction of High Courts against decisions made by various tribunals. In a case […]
The Supreme Court has sought the Enforcement Directorate’s response to a bail plea by AAP leader Sanjay Singh in a money laundering case related to the Delhi liquor policy scam. Singh’s arrest and detention, alongside other AAP figures, have raised significant legal and political attention. The case is set for review on March 5.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is embroiled in a dispute over alleged land encroachment, with the Supreme Court criticizing the party for occupying land meant for the Delhi High Court’s expansion. AAP vehemently denies the claims, vowing to present evidence. With the next hearing on February 19, the case garners significant attention due to its legal and political implications.
