A petition by lawyer Mathew J. Nedumpara seeks to challenge the designation of 70 senior advocates by the Delhi High Court, alleging the process is influenced by favouritism and unlawful factors. The Supreme Court will hear the case on January 2, 2025, addressing the implications for equality and professional rights under the Constitution.
The Supreme Court dismissed an NGO’s plea regarding poor conditions in Madhya Pradesh government schools, directing the NGO to approach the High Court instead. The petition highlighted unsafe infrastructure, lack of hygiene, insufficient teachers, and inadequate facilities, emphasizing violations of students’ educational rights, and prompting concerns about the state’s responsibilities in education.
Today, On 23rd October, the Supreme Court rejected Swamy Shraddananda’s appeal against his life imprisonment for murdering his wife, reaffirming the lower court’s decision. Shraddananda, 84, had challenged the ruling, asserting violations of his constitutional rights. The court emphasized that presidential pardon powers apply even with life sentences, leaving him to serve his term.
Supreme Court advocate Ujjawal Gaur urged the UGC and NTA to expedite the release of delayed UGC NET results, citing significant distress for students. He warned of potential legal action due to violations of constitutional rights, emphasizing the emotional and financial burden faced by candidates while awaiting results following exam rescheduling amidst alleged paper leaks.
![[Criminalization Of Marital Rape] "We (Centre) Will Be Filing A Reply Soon, Don't Hear It This Week": SG Mehta Tells CJI](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-5-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Khushboo Saifi’s appeal to the Supreme Court focuses on the constitutional validity of the marital rape exception under Section 375 of the IPC. The Supreme Court will hear the case after the Centre submits its response. The Delhi High Court issued conflicting opinions on the exception, emphasizing the need for legal clarity on women’s rights in marriage.
On Wednesday(11th Sept), During the Supreme Court hearing, Attorney General R. Venkataramani stressed that enforcing fundamental duties requires ongoing legislative action and oversight. His comments came as the court reviewed a petition by lawyer Durga Dutt seeking clear laws to ensure compliance with constitutional duties.
Today, On 16th August, A civil rights group, Social Jurist, urged Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud to address the poor state of state-run schools in Madhya Pradesh, citing inadequate infrastructure, lack of teachers, unhygienic conditions, and violation of students’ rights. The letter emphasized the need for modern facilities and requested judicial intervention for necessary reforms.
The Chief Justice of India, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, today refused to entertain a petition seeking judicial directives to combat superstition, emphasizing that education, societal reform, and legislative action are essential. The Court stressed that courts cannot address all societal problems and that the responsibility of addressing such issues lies with civil society and democratic institutions.
The Supreme Court today declined to stay the Patna High Court’s ruling that annulled the increase in reservation for Backward Classes, Extremely Backward Classes, and Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/STs) in Bihar from 50% to 65% in public employment and educational institutions. The final hearing is scheduled for September, with no interim relief granted.
The Delhi High Court upheld a law mandating 50% coverage of health warnings on pan masala packaging to inform consumers about its harmful effects. The ruling aimed to promote public health and increase consumer awareness. The Court dismissed a plea by a pan masala company, emphasizing the regulation’s proportionate nature and its alignment with public interest.