CJI Sanjiv Khanna’s Notable Judgments: From RTI to Waqf Amendment Act & Article 370 Explained

Justice Sanjiv Khanna, who served on over 480 benches, delivered significant rulings on crucial legal and social issues, including the RTI, Waqf Amendment Act, and Article 370, shaping India’s judicial landscape.

Pahalgam Terror Attack Linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Drug Trade Backed by ISI, Says NIA in Supreme Court

The NIA has linked the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack to a narco-terror plan by Lashkar-e-Taiba, supported by Pakistan’s ISI. Four suspects have been identified. The NIA revealed a significant heroin haul intended to fund terrorism and harm youth. Despite security measures, attackers in Army uniforms executed the assault on tourists.

BREAKING | SCBA, SCAORA, DHCBA and NDBA Condemn Pahalgam Terror Attack, Express Solidarity with Victims and Families

The Delhi High Court Bar Association and New Delhi Bar Association condemned the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in loss of innocent lives. Legal bodies expressed sorrow, urged government action, and united in symbolic protests, emphasizing the need for peace, justice, and national integrity against such cowardly acts.

[Centre Vs. Supreme Court] How the Centre Pre-Empted Adverse Supreme Court Orders: Waqf Act, Sedition Law & Article 370 Cases Explained

The Central Government has decided to temporarily suspend two controversial provisions of the Waqf Act, 2025, following indications from the Supreme Court about a potential stay on them. This pattern of reassessment arises when the Centre anticipates unfavorable court rulings, helping it maintain influence over contentious laws amid ongoing legal scrutiny.

Gyanesh Kumar Takes Charge Before SC Hearing on Poll Chief Selection : “Election Commission Was, Is, & Will Always Be With the Voters”

Today, On 19th February, Gyanesh Kumar has taken charge ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner. His appointment was officially announced late last night. The decision has sparked controversy, with Rahul Gandhi and the Congress raising objections to his nomination. The issue is expected to be discussed in the top court soon.

Gyanesh Kumar Appointed As Next Chief Election Commissioner, Congress Raises Objections

The government has announced that Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar will take over as the next Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) after Rajiv Kumar. Gyanesh Kumar is currently the senior-most election commissioner after Rajiv Kumar. His appointment was confirmed late this evening. Gyanesh Kumar will oversee key elections, including assembly polls in five states: West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu (all ruled by the Opposition), and Bihar and Assam (both NDA-ruled). The Bihar election is set for later this year, while the others are scheduled for 2026.

Article 370 Was Meant To Fade Away: Ex-CJI Chandrachud Defends Supreme Court Verdict

Former CJI Chandrachud defended the Supreme Court’s verdict on Article 370, stating that the provision was always meant to fade away. In an interview with the BBC, he highlighted that it was introduced as a temporary measure due to war conditions. He emphasized that the Court upheld the elected government’s decision to abrogate it. According to him, the ruling aligns with the constitutional framework and historical context.

JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Justice Surya Kant, born on February 10, 1962, has served on the Supreme Court since May 24, 2019, and is set to retire on February 9, 2027. Notable for his 54 authored judgments, he previously held key legal positions including Advocate General of Haryana and Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh, contributing significantly to Indian law.

JUSTICE BR GAVAI

Justice BR Gavai, born on November 24, 1960, became a Supreme Court judge on May 24, 2019. He authored 147 judgments, addressing issues like the validity of arbitration agreements, the abrogation of Article 370, and the constitutionality of the electoral bond scheme. Gavai is noted for his integrity and seniority in the judiciary.

“Should Any One Party Decide What Case the Supreme Court Should Hear?”: EX-CJI Chandrachud on UBT Sena Allegations

Former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud addressed criticisms from the Shiv Sena (UBT) regarding the Supreme Court’s case selections and the MVA’s electoral losses. He defended the judiciary’s independence, emphasizing that case decisions are not for any single party to dictate. He noted significant cases pending for years require attention and asserted the court’s impartiality against political pressure.