The Himachal Pradesh High Court criticized a civil court judge for issuing a coercive order without prior notice, emphasizing the violation of legal principles and fundamental rights. The judge apologized, citing workload and infrastructure issues but was warned that expeditiousness must not overlook legal requirements. The High Court highlighted the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to legal procedures.
The Supreme Court of India sternly rebuked State governments and Union Territories for their passive approach towards overcrowded prisons, emphasizing the need for immediate action. The Court highlighted the fundamental rights implications of prison overcrowding and urged for expeditious measures, emphasizing the significance of prison reforms and the government’s responsibility. Specific states were called out for their lackadaisical approach and demanded to comply with directives for urgent improvement. The case, “In Re: Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons,” continues to address these critical concerns, with a scheduled review on July 11.
The Supreme Court of India addressed the inhumane conditions in Indian prisons, urging states and union territories to take comprehensive measures to improve inmate well-being. The Court emphasized the protection of prisoners’ fundamental rights and directed officials to submit detailed affidavits addressing capacity, logistics, and enhancement efforts. The apex court set a deadline for these submissions and called for urgent action.
Today(on 3rd July), The Supreme Court of India chastised the NIA for delaying the trial in a counterfeit currency case, leading to the accused being held in jail for four years without trial, emphasizing the constitutional right to a speedy trial regardless of the offense’s severity.
Today, On 1st July, The Delhi High Court issued a notice to Delhi Police in response to a plea by Bibhav Kumar challenging his potential arrest in the Swati Maliwal assault case. Kumar, an associate of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, denied bail due to the serious nature of the allegations. The case carries political implications for the Aam Aadmi Party.
Today, On 28th June, The West Bengal Bar Council declared July 1 as a ‘black day’ in protest against three new criminal laws. The Calcutta High Court ruled that no one can be forced to observe a strike, contradicting the Bar Council’s decision. The Bar Council of India recognized protests against these laws and called for a productive discussion with the government.
The Delhi High Court has directed the formation of a medical board to assess Amit Katyal’s health, a close associate of Lalu Prasad, who is seeking interim bail on medical grounds in a money laundering case. Katyal underwent bariatric surgery, and the court emphasized the right to health as a component of the right to life under Article 21.
Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court recently remarked that granting bail to one accused while denying it to another under similar circumstances, without clear justification, undermines public confidence in the judicial process.
The Delhi High Court reserved its decision on hearing a criminal writ petition filed by Bibhav Kumar against his arrest for assaulting MP Swati Maliwal. Kumar seeks to declare his arrest as illegal, citing a violation of his rights. This case involves political figures and their accusations, adding complexity to the situation.
The Bombay High Court on 24th May, granted interim bail to Sohail Salim Ansari, convicted for the 2014 murder of Shiv Sena leader Ramesh Jadhav. This decision allows him to appear for a law entrance exam. Despite opposition, the court considered his nine years served and reinforced the principle of access to education for convicts.
