Allahabad High Court: Right to Change Name is a Fundamental Right

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that every person in India has the fundamental right to choose or change their name. The court said this right is protected under the Indian Constitution.A man named Sameer Rao had filed a petition in the court, asking for his name to be changed from “Shahnawaz” to “Md Sameer Rao” in his school records. According to a report by media, his request was earlier rejected by the Uttar Pradesh Board of Secondary Education.

Supreme Court Seeks BCI Reply on Plea Against Mandatory Criminal Background Checks, CCTV in Law Colleges

In September 2024, the BCI issued a notification mandating strict new measures for all Centers of Legal Education (CLEs) across the country. NEW DELHI: On Friday. The Supreme Court of India has asked the Bar Council of India (BCI) to respond to petitions challenging two circulars issued by the bar body in September 2024. These […]

ANI vs Wikipedia|| “Will Read the Articles to See Whether the Edits Are Borne Out of the Articles or Not”: Delhi HC to Examine Caravan, Ken Articles for Interim Relief

The Delhi High Court will review articles from The Caravan and The Ken to determine interim relief in the defamation case filed by ANI against Wikipedia. ANI claims that Wikipedia permitted defamatory edits to its page on the platform. The court’s examination of these articles is crucial to the ongoing legal dispute. This case highlights concerns over content accuracy and accountability on online platforms.

“Press Must Draw ‘Lakshman Rekha’ & Avoid Media Trials”: Kerala HC Cautions Media Responsibility

The Kerala High Court emphasized the need for responsible media reporting, cautioning against “media trials” that presuppose guilt or innocence in ongoing cases. While freedom of speech is fundamental, it must not overshadow the judiciary’s role or the accused’s right to a fair trial, warning against prejudicing public opinion.

‘What a Dumbfound Lady’ Comments Against Congress’ Shama Mohamed: Delhi HC Slams BJP Leader Sanju Verma

The Delhi High Court ordered the removal of derogatory tweets and a YouTube video by BJP leader Sanju Verma against Congress spokesperson Dr. Shama Mohamed. Justice Vikas Mahajan criticized Verma’s comments as defamatory and emphasized the importance of reputation, urging responsible speech in public discourse, especially for political figures.

“In Democratic Nations, Freedom to Express One’s Views is Respected”: SC Grants Protection to Journalist Facing Charges for Tweet on Caste Bias in UP Administration

Today, On 24th October, the Supreme Court provided interim protection to journalist Mamta Tripathi, who faced multiple FIRs for tweeting about caste bias in Uttar Pradesh’s administration. The Court has requested the state government’s response to her plea for quashing the FIRs, emphasizing journalists’ rights under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

[Hate Speech Case] HC Temporarily Stays Criminal Proceedings Against Former Union Minister Basanagoudar Patil Yatnal

The Karnataka High Court temporarily stayed all criminal proceedings against Basanagoudar Patil Yatnal, a former Union Minister and BJP leader, related to a 2022 hate speech case. Yatnal’s remarks, perceived as inciting communal tension, drew public outrage and legal action, but he claims the allegations are politically motivated. The court’s stay offers him temporary relief.

Top Editors’ Writes to Home Minister Amit Shah on Misuse of New Criminal Laws Against Journalists

The Editors Guild of India (EGI) has expressed concerns to Union Home Minister Amit Shah about potential misuse of new criminal laws against journalists. They emphasize the need for additional safeguards and proposed a review of the laws to prevent frivolous prosecution. The Guild seeks protection of media freedom under the Indian Constitution and requests a meeting with Shah to address these issues.

[Shivaji Title Row] ‘Police Exceeded Authority’ By Seeking Probe Against Professor: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court criticized Satara police for instructing a college to probe a professor for not using a specific title for historical figure Shivaji. The court emphasized the police exceeded their authority and questioned their understanding of free speech. The police unconditionally withdrew the directive following the court intervention.

Electoral Bonds Massive Controversy | SBI Seeks Extension, Opposition Raises Concerns: SC Hearing on March 11

The State Bank of India (SBI) has approached the Supreme Court seeking an extension for disclosing details of electoral bonds encashed by political parties. The Supreme Court of India, under the leadership of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, is set to deliberate on a crucial plea from the State Bank of India (SBI). The State Bank […]