Supreme Court Dismisses Lalit Modi’s Petition to Make BCCI Pay ED Penalty: “Plea Rejected, But Civil Remedy Open”

Today, On The Supreme Court dismissed Lalit Modi’s plea asking BCCI to pay his Rs 10.65 crore FEMA penalty imposed by the ED. However, the bench clarified that he can still seek civil remedies under the law.

Supreme Court Rules Air Force School Not a ‘State’ Under Article 12 in 2:1 Verdict

The Supreme Court ruled 2:1 that the Air Force School in Bamrauli is not a “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution, meaning contract employees cannot seek regularisation through writ petitions. The majority opinion emphasized the school’s private management, while the dissent highlighted its public function in education and significant control by the IAF.

Gauhati High Court Dismisses Case Against LLB Student, Imposes Fine as Deterrent: “Apology & Rs. 10k Payment to Student Welfare Fund”

The Gauhati High Court cancelled disciplinary notices issued to an LLB student for allegedly protesting against college authorities. The court found the actions against the student unfair and ordered the institution to pay Rs. 10,000 as a penalty. The judgment highlights the need to protect students’ right to express their concerns. It sends a clear message against suppressing dissent in educational institutions.

‘Breastfeeding A Fundamental Right Of Lactating Mother Under Art 21’: Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court affirmed a nurse’s right to 120 days of Child Care Leave, emphasizing the fundamental rights of both mothers and infants to breastfeeding under Article 21 of the Constitution. The ruling dismissed challenges from NIMHANS, highlighting the importance of these rights during children’s formative years and the organization’s duty as a model employer.

Air India Ceased to be a “State” Entity Under Article 12 After Disinvestment by Tata Group: SC

Today (16th May): The Supreme Court ruled that Air India Limited ceased to be a state entity under Article 12 of the Constitution after its disinvestment and transfer to the Tata Group. The court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court’s verdict, stating that post-privatization, the company no longer fell under the court’s writ jurisdiction. The appellants were directed to seek alternative avenues for remedy.