![[Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath Disputes] SC to Decide on Transfer Case to Allahabad HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-63.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court is reviewing a plea to transfer the Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath dispute cases to the Allahabad High Court. This follows a January ruling allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi Mosque’s cellar. Legal debates center on historical claims, the influence of the Places of Worship Act, and concerns of conflicting judgments in ongoing cases.
Today, On 12th November, the Supreme Court criticized the Defence Colony Welfare Association for illegally occupying the Gumti tomb in Delhi, highlighting the ASI’s failure to prevent this. The Court emphasized the need to protect heritage sites, ordered an expert assessment of the tomb’s damage, and scheduled further hearings for January 2025.
Today, On 23rd October, the ASI informed the Delhi High Court that designating Jama Masjid as a protected monument would significantly impact preservation efforts and local regulations. The court expressed reluctance but called for suggestions to enhance management and address encroachments while reviewing PILs concerning its protection status and historical significance.
Today, On 11th September, in the Gyanvapi case, the Hindu side requested court permission for an Archaeological Survey of India excavation at the disputed site, aiming to uncover evidence of its religious history. The court will assess this request amid the ongoing legal dispute with the Muslim community. This case centers on the claim that a mosque was built atop an ancient Hindu temple, sparking a heated legal battle.
Today, On 4th July, The Madhya Pradesh High Court directed the Archaeological Survey of India to submit a survey report on the Bhojshala complex by July 15, amid ongoing legal proceedings. The complex is revered by both Hindus and Muslims, with special arrangements allowing religious rituals for both communities. The court has set the next hearing for July 22.
Today,22nd April, The Supreme Court seeks the ASI’s input for a Taj Mahal conservation plan, emphasizing the need for long-term preservation. The ASI’s expertise is crucial for safeguarding the iconic monument. Other directives include addressing the cleaning of the Yamuna river and granting Agra the World Heritage City tag. Further hearings are scheduled for July 11.
The Baghpat Court concluded a 53-year dispute over land believed to be the ‘lakshagriha’ from the Mahabharata, resolving conflicting claims between Muslims and Hindus. The area is also home to a Sufi saint’s tomb and a graveyard, making it a hub of religious and cultural significance. The judgement marked the resolution of this longstanding issue.
The Allahabad High Court issued a notice responding to a plea regarding the Gyanvapi Mosque in India. The plea calls for an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) examination of the mosque’s wuzukhana (ablution pond) area. This notice marks a pivotal moment in the legal and cultural discourse surrounding the iconic Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi.
In the Gyanvapi mosque case, a Hindu plaintiff urges the Supreme Court to allow a scientific survey of an alleged ‘Shivling’. They emphasize the need for a detailed investigation and propose the removal of modern structures to facilitate the survey. This plea holds significance for India’s cultural and religious heritage and could set a precedent for similar cases.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has recently approached the Varanasi court with a significant plea concerning the Gyanvapi survey report. The ASI has requested an extension of four weeks before making the survey findings public, a move that has drawn attention in legal and historical circles. Also read-Allahabad High Court Reserves Judgment In High-Profile […]