The Allahabad High Court has rescheduled the hearing in the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute to September 26. The matter, involving claims over the birthplace of Lord Krishna, continues to remain one of the most closely watched legal battles.
In the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, the Allahabad High Court has allowed a civil suit to proceed as a representative case, permitting the plaintiffs to represent all devotees of Lord Krishna in the legal proceedings.
Today, On 4th July, In the ongoing Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition from the Hindu side that sought to label the Shahi Idgah mosque as a ‘disputed structure’ linked to the Mathura temple.
Today, On 28th April,In the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court order allowing the Hindu side to amend their plea, stating, “One thing is clear, amendment must be allowed,” while hearing the appeal filed by the Muslim side against the High Court order allowing the amendment.
The Nagpur police have sent 17 people to police custody until March 22 in connection with the recent violence over the Aurangzeb tomb issue. The case has created tension in the city, leading to multiple arrests. The police custody of 51 accused, including alleged mastermind Fahim Khan, ends today. All of them will be presented before the court for further legal proceedings. Authorities are keeping a close watch on the situation to prevent further unrest. The court’s decision on their custody will be crucial in handling the case.
Today, On 28th February, The Allahabad High Court ruled that no painting will be done at the Jama Masjid in Sambhal, allowing only cleaning of the premises. The decision came after the ASI inspected the site and found no need for painting. The Muslim side had requested painting before Ramadan, but the Hindu side opposed it, citing concerns over evidence tampering. The court’s ruling brings relief to the Hindu side while the Muslim side may present further arguments in the next hearing.
Advocate-on-Record (AOR) Vishnu Shankar Jain presented strong arguments in the Bhojshala case at the Supreme Court of India. He supported his claims with solid facts and important documents. His careful approach and legal knowledge helped bring out key points in the case. This hearing is getting a lot of attention because it involves history and religious beliefs.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) told the Supreme Court that the structures in Mehrauli Archaeological Park have religious importance. ASI’s statement emphasizes that these structures are an important part of India’s history and culture. The park has many monuments, some of which are believed to have religious value.
Today, On 29th November, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna requested a postponement of the Shahi Jama Masjid survey hearing, highlighting the need for careful judicial handling of sensitive matters. The Supreme Court instructed the mosque’s management to approach the High Court against a survey order. Violence erupted during a prior survey, raising communal harmony concerns.
The Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in the Gyanvapi case legitimized surveys of disputed religious sites, providing a precedent for similar cases. The decision, permitting the Archaeological Survey of India to investigate the mosque complex, has incited claims over additional contested worship places, leading to escalating tensions and legal disputes across the country.
