Supreme Court Justice N Kotiswar Singh highlighted the lack of expertise among judges in handling commercial cases. He emphasized that judges are generalists, not specialists, making it challenging to deal with complex commercial disputes. Speaking at a legal event, he stressed the need for specialized training to improve judicial efficiency. His remarks underscore the importance of reforming commercial courts for better dispute resolution.
The Supreme Court has provided clarity on identifying the law applicable to arbitration agreements. The ruling addresses conflicts arising from multiple arbitration clauses in international commercial contracts governed by Indian law. It establishes guidelines for resolving such disputes effectively. This decision strengthens the legal framework for arbitration in cross-border agreements.
The Supreme Court ruled that government entities cannot include clauses for unilateral arbitrator appointments in public-private contracts, as these violate Article 14 of the Constitution, undermining fairness. The decision, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, applies to three-member arbitration panels, emphasizing equal treatment and impartiality in the arbitration process.
![[Breaking] Paris Olympics 2024| CAS Postpones Verdict on Vinesh Phogat’s Appeal to August 16](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-47-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) postponed its decision on Indian wrestler Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification controversy until August 13, fueling uncertainty and high attention. Phogat’s appeal regarding her disqualification due to a minor weight margin has drawn widespread interest, including involvement from the International Olympic Committee and the Indian Olympic Association. Senior Advocate Harish Salve represents Phogat in this pivotal legal battle.