Justice Hima Kohli and Gary Born addressed the need for a separate statute for international arbitration in India at the London International Disputes Week. They highlighted the existing framework’s effectiveness and emphasized the importance of minimizing court involvement in arbitration to ensure efficient dispute resolution. They also discussed the significance of contextual relevance in legal precedents.
When conflicting judgments of equal benches arise and a larger bench reference is pending, the judgment delivered earlier will prevail, as per a recent Allahabad High Court ruling. Upholding judicial discipline, the court emphasized the doctrine of stare decisis, ensuring consistency and predictability in legal decisions. The case was referred to a larger bench for decision.
The Calcutta High Court emphasizes the value of court time and criticizes dishonest litigants for misusing the legal system. Justice Kapur reprimanded a Dubai-based company for filing an application in the wrong jurisdiction, highlighting the need for integrity in legal proceedings. The court rejected the plea and urged advocates to reflect on their actions.
Delhi High Court examines a case regarding Google Ads’ impact on Indian advertisers’ arbitration rights. Startupwala demands reinstatement of ads disapproved by Google, citing Arbitration Act. NEW DELHI: Recently, The Delhi High Court examining a case involving Google’s advertising system and its potential impact on Indian advertisers’ ability to seek legal recourse domestically. A petition […]
