Justice B.V. Nagarathna voiced concern that the Supreme Court is increasingly burdened with minor matters, forcing it to function like a family or bail court instead of focusing on truly significant constitutional issues.
NEW DELHI: On February 6, 2025, the Supreme Court of India postponed the hearing on the bail pleas of advocate Surendra Gadling and activist Jyoti Jagtap, who were arrested in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. The bench, consisting of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal, also deferred the hearing on a petition filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) challenging the bail granted to activist Mahesh Raut by the Bombay High Court.
The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court acquitted two boys of stalking a minor girl, stating that a single instance of following does not constitute stalking under the IPC and POCSO Act. However, one boy was upheld on charges of sexual assault based on credible evidence, while the other faced reduced sentencing.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday, December 19, heard multiple petitions challenging the Calcutta High Court’s decision regarding the alleged teacher recruitment scam in West Bengal.
The case was heard by a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi represented the state of West Bengal, arguing that the state government was cooperating with the investigation and supported the separation of tainted and clean candidates as noted in the High Court’s directives.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today (13th Nov) ruled that demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful. In issuing guidelines, the Court emphasized the rule of law, separation of powers, and accountability. No demolition should occur without a proper notice and opportunity for appeal. Officials failing to follow these directives may face personal financial consequences.
The Supreme Court today (23rd Oct) highlighted the necessity of enhancing legal aid awareness for prisoners by mandating the display of legal aid information in public places. The court urged collaboration between legal services authorities to implement effective aid frameworks, promote local language literature, and conduct campaigns, ensuring access to justice for all, especially the marginalized.
Today, On 10th September, The Supreme Court directed States and Union Territories to promptly inform convicts of remission decisions and their right to appeal. It urged the National Legal Services Authority to provide prompt legal assistance for challenging rejection orders. The Court emphasized efficient case disposal, granting bail, and relaxing bail conditions for undertrial prisoners.
The Delhi High Court has scheduled a hearing for the appeals of four individuals convicted in the 1975 assassination of former Railway Minister L N Mishra. This comes nearly 50 years after the incident, with the court setting a strict deadline for the proceeding and instructing both parties to submit their synopses and judgments.
Today, On 6th September, the Chief Justice of India acknowledged concerns about vacancies in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) raised by the Bengaluru Bar Association. He assured that the Supreme Court will address the issue and look into the unfilled positions. The ITAT, responsible for direct tax appeals, currently faces delays due to insufficient members.