The Supreme Court made significant rulings on various constitutional and legal issues, including the non-challenge of statutes based on basic structure, necessity for official notifications for customs exemptions, and limitations on property rights. The Court reinforced principles of fairness, integrity in appointments, and guidelines against punitive demolitions while addressing social justice concerns.
Justice Dipankar Datta, born on August 10, 1960, assumed office in the Supreme Court on December 12, 2022, after serving as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court. With 81 authored judgments, notable cases include media influence in investigations and challenges against restrictive IT Rules. He retires on February 8, 2030.
Justice Surya Kant, born on February 10, 1962, has served on the Supreme Court since May 24, 2019, and is set to retire on February 9, 2027. Notable for his 54 authored judgments, he previously held key legal positions including Advocate General of Haryana and Chief Justice of Himachal Pradesh, contributing significantly to Indian law.
Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath criticized Aligarh Muslim University for its 50% Muslim reservation, questioning its fairness to SCs, STs, and OBCs, despite central funding. He emphasized the need for equal opportunities as mandated by the Constitution and pointed out political parties hindering favorable policies for electoral gain.
![[BREAKING] "Statutory Creation Doesn't Nullify Minority Status Of AMU': Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/AMU.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will announce its judgment on November 8 about Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that questioning this status may threaten India’s secular nature. He emphasized that AMU’s administration does not require a majority of Muslims or Christians to retain its minority classification, highlighting historical and legal context.
The Supreme Court of India emphasized the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), stressing its establishment for Muslims. A crucial debate ensued regarding the coexistence of national importance and minority character. The ongoing examination has significant implications for India’s educational landscape, shedding light on minority rights and institutional roles in a diverse society.
The Centre emphasized to the Supreme Court the need for national reflection in institutions of national significance like Aligarh Muslim University. Solicitor General highlighted the absence of reservation and the institution’s importance. The case revolves around AMU’s minority status, with ongoing deliberation by a seven-judge constitution bench. The hearing continues on Wednesday.
The Supreme Court expressed surprise at the Central Government’s refusal to recognize the 1981 amendment granting minority status to Aligarh Muslim University. The Court emphasized the government’s obligation to stand by parliamentary actions, while the Solicitor General cited a high court verdict striking down the amendment. The discussion will continue on January 30.