Delhi High Court Puts Rs 340 Cr Fine on Hold in Beverly Hills Polo Club vs Amazon Case – Big Win for E-Commerce Giant!

Delhi High Court Today (July 1) stayed a Rs 340 crore damages order against Amazon in a trademark case filed by Beverly Hills Polo Club owner Lifestyle Equities. The stay came without Amazon needing to deposit any money.

Delhi High Court Directs OTT Platforms and Film Producers to Add Accessibility Features for Disabled Viewers

The Delhi High Court has mandated OTT platforms like Netflix and Amazon Prime to implement accessibility features such as audio descriptions, captioning, and Indian Sign Language for films to accommodate visually and hearing-impaired individuals. The ruling aims for inclusivity in upcoming and existing movies, with guidelines from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to follow.

Delhi High Court Awards Rs 340 Crore to Lifestyle Equities in Landmark Trademark Case Against Amazon

The Delhi High Court awarded Lifestyle Equities $39 million after ruling Amazon infringed its trademark. The case, highlighting e-commerce liability, emphasizes the need for platforms to address trademark violations.

Supreme Court Transfers Amazon, Flipkart Antitrust Cases to Karnataka High Court Following CCI Plea

The Supreme Court transferred 24 writ petitions regarding Amazon and Flipkart’s anti-competitive practices to the Karnataka High Court, following a request from the Competition Commission of India (CCI). This consolidation aims to unify ongoing cases related to alleged violations of the Competition Act, 2002, enhancing efficiency and consistency in rulings.

Supreme Court in CCI vs. Amazon and Flipkart – “Prima Facie, All Cases Should Be Transferred to Karnataka High Court”

The Supreme Court of India indicated that all pending cases against Amazon and Flipkart for alleged anti-competitive practices should be transferred to the Karnataka High Court. During a hearing, the Court directed no hearings on Amazon’s petitions until January 6 and permitted the Competition Commission of India to amend and add parties to the cases.

‘No Litigant Should Bypass Rules’: SC Rejects CCI’s Plea to Move Amazon and Flipkart Cases to Karnataka HC Division Bench

The Supreme Court denied the Competition Commission of India’s request to transfer cases involving Amazon and Flipkart to a division bench, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules. Justice Oka highlighted the importance of not providing special treatment to litigants. The cases are set for a hearing on December 17 in the Karnataka High Court.

Amazon & Flipkart Cases | ‘E-commerce Antitrust Cases’: CJI Khanna To Deliberate On CCI’s Plea For Consolidation

Attorney General R. Venkataramani Today (Dec 12) urged the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to list the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) plea seeking consolidation of writ petitions filed by e-commerce resellers. The matter, which Venkataramani mentioned before CJI, is expected to be heard on Monday (Dec 16).

Amazon & Flipkart Cases

India’s Antitrust Body Urges Supreme Court: ‘Stop Attempts to Scuttle Probe Against Amazon and Flipkart’

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has urged the Supreme Court to consolidate 23 lawsuits aimed at obstructing its antitrust investigation into Amazon, Flipkart, Samsung, and Vivo. The probe, initiated in 2020, uncovers alleged violations of antitrust laws, with accusations of preferential treatment. The Supreme Court is set to hear the plea amid ongoing tensions in India’s growing e-commerce sector.

“Ingenious Modus Operandi”: Karnataka HC Exposes Scam to Defraud Amazon of Rs. 69 Lakh

Two individuals, Sourish Bose and Deepanvita Ghosh, are accused of defrauding Amazon of over Rs. 69 lakh by purchasing items, initiating returns, and returning fake products instead of originals. The Karnataka High Court described their actions as “ingenious” and has reserved its decision on their petition to quash the FIR against them.

AMAZON SCAM | Consumer Court Imposes Penalty on Amazon for Delivering Dirty Rice Bowl Instead of Laptop Table

AMAZON SCAM | The Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission upheld a Rs.20,000 fine on Amazon and a retailer for delivering a ‘dirty’ rice bowl instead of a laptop table. The Commission emphasized Amazon’s duty to ensure product quality and dismissed claims of intermediary protection. Amazon’s appeal was dismissed, and it was directed to deliver the correct product to the customer.