![[BREAKING] Excise Case: SC Grants Bail to Businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Media-8.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today (25th Oct) granted bail to businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall in a corruption case linked to an excise policy scam. The judges noted the CBI still needs to examine around 300 witnesses, and the trial has not started, highlighting Dhall’s year-long custody compared to other defendants granted bail.
![[BREAKING] Excise Case: SC Grants Bail to Businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2024-09-24T132245.685.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today(24th Sept) denied an urgent hearing for businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall’s bail plea, challenging a Delhi High Court decision in an excise policy corruption case. Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan emphasized the need to consider the plight of poor litigants and scheduled the case for the second week of October.
![[Breaking] Excise Policy case: Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court denied bail to businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall in the Delhi Excise Scam case, citing the seriousness of the allegations, risk of tampering with evidence, and influencing witnesses. The court also pointed to the potential impact on society. The case involves allegations of bribery and irregularities in the Delhi excise policy.
Today, On 25th April, The Delhi High Court issued a notice to the CBI in response to a plea challenging the trial court’s decision on the Excise Policy case. The case involves incomplete investigations and potential implications for excise policies. The court sought a response from the CBI and fixed the matter for May 3, 2024, indicating a critical phase in the legal process.
The Delhi High Court has issued a directive to the Delhi government, emphasizing the need for proper medical infrastructure in prisons. This order comes in response to the inadequate healthcare facilities in jails, which the Court noted could violate an inmate’s right to timely medical care. The decision underscores the fundamental right to life and […]
