The Allahabad High Court rejected the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee’s plea, allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque’s southern cellar. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board expressed astonishment and announced plans to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. They criticized the court for not affording the Muslim side an opportunity to present their perspective. The AIMPLB plans to seek an audience with President Droupadi Murmu. Additionally, they alleged a separate law for the majority in courts and questioned the fairness of the judicial system. The Gyanvapi case has sparked controversy and raised concerns about religious rights and judicial equality.
The Allahabad High Court has confirmed the decision of a single-judge bench from May, which ruled that the dismissal of the law officer and five faculty members from Dr. Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University was unlawful. Allahabad High Court has affirmed the reinstatement of a law officer and five faculty members at Dr. Shakuntala Misra […]
The Allahabad High Court issued a notice responding to a plea regarding the Gyanvapi Mosque in India. The plea calls for an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) examination of the mosque’s wuzukhana (ablution pond) area. This notice marks a pivotal moment in the legal and cultural discourse surrounding the iconic Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi.
The Allahabad High Court has made a profound statement on the nature of lawyers’ strikes, asserting that they bring the wheels of justice to a standstill and are detrimental to the pursuit of justice. The court, in its January 24 order, expressed this concern in strong terms:
The Allahabad High Court recently dismissed pleas from eight Hindu-Muslim couples seeking protection for their interfaith marriages under India’s anti-conversion laws. The ruling highlights the legal complexities and challenges faced by such couples and emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to laws concerning religious conversion and marriage in the country.
The Allahabad High Court reaffirmed a husband’s duty to financially support his wife, even without formal employment, citing potential earnings from unskilled labor. The case involved a married couple, with the wife filing an FIR against her husband and in-laws. The court emphasized the husband’s obligation to provide maintenance, setting a precedent for similar cases.
Although these were cases of interfaith marriages, the unions themselves did not adhere to the legal stipulations outlined by the anti-conversion law. In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has recently dismissed petitions filed by eight Hindu-Muslim couples seeking protection of life and non-interference in their matrimonial lives. The Court’s decision, delivered by Justice […]
Employers might take into account special circumstances in deciding whether to terminate or cancel a candidate’s application. The Allahabad High Court has reinforced the critical importance of honesty in disclosing criminal history in job applications. This decision, crucial in the landscape of employment law, underscores the consequences of suppressing facts about one’s criminal record, including […]
The Allahabad High Court administration has mandated respectful and humble interactions between court officials and legal professionals to promote a professional and congenial environment. This initiative emphasizes the crucial role of lawyers and clerks in the judicial process and aims to prevent unprofessional behavior. The directive reflects the court’s commitment to upholding justice and fairness.
The Allahabad High Court in India dismissed a plea by a man claiming his partner was forcibly detained, citing cultural differences and disdain for tarnishing reputation. The court emphasized India’s tradition and the attempt to pressure the woman’s family. The decision reflects India’s adherence to cultural norms, contrasting with liberal Western views on relationships.
