The Allahabad High Court, led by Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan, emphasized the need for detailed reasoning in passing orders. The court ruled in favor of a petitioner challenging an order under Section 319 of the CrPC, citing the absence of subjective satisfaction and proper reasoning. As a result, the court canceled the order dated 15.12.2023.
The Allahabad High Court quashed a rape case against a police constable after the complainant clarified it was due to a ‘misunderstanding’. The decision underscored the court’s discretionary power to administer justice based on facts. It emphasizes the need for thorough investigation and concrete evidence in serious offenses, contributing to the discourse on fair trials.
The Supreme Court rejected the Uttar Pradesh Home Secretary’s appeal against the Allahabad High Court’s warning on pension benefits. The High Court had set a deadline for compliance and threatened contempt proceedings. The Supreme Court’s decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to court orders and maintaining legal system integrity.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that investigations under the Criminal Procedure Code for offenses under the Indian Penal Code are not prohibited by the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, addressing a case involving substandard drugs and forged test reports posing serious public health risks from VADSP Pharmaceuticals. The court emphasized the critical need for transparency and integrity in the pharmaceutical industry to protect public health.
The Varanasi District Court is set to address a Hindu plea for an ASI survey of Gyanvapi Mosque basements, impacting worship activities and seeking insight into its historical and religious significance. The postponement of the hearing is influenced by anticipation of a related hearing at the Allahabad High Court, set for February 12. The legal contention revolves around orders impacting the use of the mosque’s cellar and the plea for an ASI survey.
The Supreme Court of India addressed the misuse of the criminal justice system in a case involving alleged embezzlement. Justices concluded that the charges were not substantiated, emphasizing the importance of evidence in prosecution and warning against the system’s abuse for personal gain. This upholds the integrity of the legal process and maintains public trust.
The Allahabad High Court is currently hearing the Gyanvapi mosque dispute, with the Muslim side challenged to prove their possession of the mosque’s southern cellar in 1993. The court’s directive against media engagement highlights its commitment to integrity. The case is of national interest and could set significant legal precedents for religious and cultural disputes in India.
On Tuesday, the Allahabad High Court expressed its disapproval regarding lawyers and involved parties in the Gyanvapi mosque-Kashi Vishwanath temple case discussing the case and its proceedings in court with the media. In the ongoing Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath case, the Allahabad High Court has expressed its disapproval towards the parties and their lawyers for engaging with […]
The Allahabad High Court has issued a notice to the Ministry of Railways, Government of India, following a 2016 gang rape incident on a moving train in Uttar Pradesh’s Mau district. The court seeks accountability for safety measures and victim compensation, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced passenger safety on India’s railway network. The case underscores the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding passengers’ rights and advocating for systemic changes.
The Allahabad High Court rejected the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee’s plea, allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque’s southern cellar. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board expressed astonishment and announced plans to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. They criticized the court for not affording the Muslim side an opportunity to present their perspective. The AIMPLB plans to seek an audience with President Droupadi Murmu. Additionally, they alleged a separate law for the majority in courts and questioned the fairness of the judicial system. The Gyanvapi case has sparked controversy and raised concerns about religious rights and judicial equality.