The Hindu party today has filed a petition to halt access to the terrace of ‘Vyas Ji Ka Tehkhana’ in the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi due to safety concerns. This comes after a recent ruling granting permission for Hindu rituals in the complex’s southern cellar, leading to ongoing legal and religious tensions.
The Allahabad High Court recently directed the provision of old age pensions to 15 individuals in Unnao, despite their lack of Aadhaar cards. The court’s empathetic approach sets a precedent for more inclusive social welfare systems. This landmark decision signifies a move towards safeguarding the rights of the elderly, regardless of technological barriers.
On Monday (26th February): The Allahabad High Court ruled that the 1993 state directive halting Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque cellar was illegal. A bench of Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal further observed that prima facie, it was illegal on the part of the Uttar Pradesh government to stop these Hindu prayers by way of an oral order […]
The Allahabad High Court rejected a plea filed by Muslim parties challenging a Varanasi court order allowing Hindu prayers in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi Mosque. This decision is part of a civil court case disputing the religious nature of the Gyanvapi compound, with conflicting claims about historical possession and the demolition of an ancient temple.
The Allahabad High Court clarified that brothel customers seeking personal satisfaction without financial gain are not liable under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The ruling distinguishes customers from those involved in managing or profiting from prostitution, offering a nuanced understanding of legal accountability. This decision sets a significant precedent for future cases.
The Supreme Court ruled that enemy properties vested with government-appointed custodians are not assets of the central government. The court emphasized that the custodian is a trustee and does not acquire ownership of the assets. Hence, the central government cannot claim exemption from civic taxes. The ruling favored the Lucknow Municipal Corporation in their appeal.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is preparing to challenge the acquittal of Moninder Singh Pandher and Surendra Koli in the 2006 Nithari killings case at the Supreme Court. The Allahabad High Court had acquitted them due to lack of evidence, but CBI aims to contest this decision, marking a significant development in the long-standing legal battle.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud inaugurates Prayagraj arbitration center at Allahabad High Court, emphasizing independence from high court support. He highlights the importance of efficient arbitration, the role of technology in judiciary, and the significant role of lawyers in nation-building. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath emphasizes the rule of law and dialogue in democracy.
The Allahabad High Court emphasized collaboration among stakeholders to address Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and ensure banking system security. Justices Varma and Saraf rejected the suspension of SARFAESI Act proceedings based on an injunction without a registered lease deed in the case involving M/S Trilokchand Fabrication. They emphasized the Act’s pivotal role and the need to curb unnecessary litigation delaying NPA resolution. The court clarified that unregistered leases cannot impede SARFAESI Act proceedings and nullified the suspension order in this case.
The Allahabad High Court has reserved its judgment on the appeal filed by the Gyanvapi Mosque committee contesting the Varanasi Court’s decision permitting Hindu prayers in the ‘Vyas Tehkhana’. The case, which revolves around possession and religious rights, highlights the delicate balance between religious freedom and property laws. The judgment’s outcome is anticipated to have significant implications.