Today, On 24th March, The Allahabad High Court Bar Association called for the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, urging a thorough CBI and ED investigation into the case. This demand comes after the Supreme Court Collegium recommended his transfer back to the Allahabad High Court, his parent court. The controversy has intensified following allegations linked to the cash discovery incident. Legal experts and officials are now closely monitoring the case.
Today, On 21st March, Several media reports claim that a large amount of cash was unexpectedly found at Justice Yashwant Varma’s residence. The discovery happened when fire brigade officials arrived to extinguish a fire at his house. Following the incident, Justice Varma has gone on leave, raising questions about judicial accountability. The Supreme Court and Delhi High Court are yet to make an official statement on the matter.
Authorities in Ghaziabad have examined 8,000 marriage records and submitted a report to the high court. During the verification, at least two cases were found where the couple’s age documents were improper and could not be verified online. Officials are reviewing these discrepancies for further action. The investigation aims to ensure compliance with legal requirements.
The Supreme Court Collegium recommended the repatriation of Justice Chandra Dhari Singh from the Delhi High Court back to the Allahabad High Court after reviewing his professional background. This decision, made on November 28-29, 2024, reflects the policy of maintaining balance in judicial appointments among various High Courts in India.
![[Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath Disputes] SC to Decide on Transfer Case to Allahabad HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-63.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court is reviewing a plea to transfer the Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath dispute cases to the Allahabad High Court. This follows a January ruling allowing Hindu prayers in the Gyanvapi Mosque’s cellar. Legal debates center on historical claims, the influence of the Places of Worship Act, and concerns of conflicting judgments in ongoing cases.
Today, On 6th November, the Delhi High Court announced a CBI investigation into Rahul Gandhi’s alleged dual citizenship following a PIL in the Allahabad High Court. BJP leader Subramanian Swamy seeks to revoke Gandhi’s citizenship, contending he holds British nationality. Court proceedings are set for December 6 amid concerns of parallel petitions.
The Delhi High Court today dismissed a PIL challenging the government’s designation of June 25 as Samvidhaan Hatya Divas, meant to honor those affected by the 1975 National Emergency. The Court emphasized that the notification did not challenge the Emergency proclamation but criticized its misuse of power. The PIL was deemed insubstantial.
The Allahabad High Court disclosed a threat against Judge Ravi Kumar Diwakar, who ordered a survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque. An investigation uncovered a plot by Islamic fundamentalist groups to assassinate him. The controversy stems from differing claims about the mosque’s history. This event highlights the challenges faced by the judiciary in India, especially regarding sensitive religious cases.
Today, On 31st May, The Allahabad High Court reserved judgment on the Krishna Janmasthan-Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura, Uttar Pradesh. Hindu litigants seek to challenge the existence of the Shahi Idgah mosque, claiming it was built on the birthplace of Lord Krishna, while the Muslim side argues that the suits are barred under the Places of Worship Act, 1991. The case has historical, religious, and legal significance, and its outcome could set a precedent for future disputes over religious sites.
The CBI has summoned Akhilesh Yadav, President of the Samajwadi Party, as a witness in an illegal mining case in Uttar Pradesh. The case involves alleged irregularities in mining lease issuance during his tenure as Chief Minister. The CBI’s actions highlight the ongoing investigation into illegal mining practices during Yadav’s administration.