Allahabad High Court Rejects Plea to Quash Case Against Man for Uploading Private Video of Wife on Facebook

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court refused to cancel the criminal case against a man accused of uploading a private video of himself and his wife on Facebook. The court strongly criticized the act, saying it was a serious breach of trust and privacy in a marriage. Justice Vinod Diwakar, who delivered the ruling, stated that the husband had “gravely breached the sanctity of the marital relations” by sharing such a video online.

BREAKING | Allahabad HC Orders ASI to Whitewash Sambhal Jama Masjid in 1 Week – Big Decision on 1927 Agreement

The Allahabad High Court Today (March 12) directed the ASI to complete whitewashing and lighting of Jama Masjid, Sambhal, within a week. The court also raised concerns over the 1927 agreement, questioning the Masjid Committee’s compliance.

Serial Fake Rape Case Scandal: Allahabad HC Orders CBI Probe Against Woman & Lawyer

The Allahabad High Court directed a CBI inquiry into a case where a woman allegedly filed multiple false rape complaints. The court suspects a misuse of law for extortion and has granted protection from arrest to the accused until credible evidence is found.

Allahabad HC Grants Bail To Rape Accused On 1 Shocking Condition: “Marry Victim In 3 Months”

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to a rape accused on the condition that he marries the victim within three months. The court’s decision has sparked debate as it remains unclear if the victim’s consent was considered.

Cops Place Lawyer Under House Arrest Citing HC Judge’s Visit: Allahabad HC Summons Police Officers

The Allahabad High Court summoned Agra police officials for placing a 70-year-old lawyer under house arrest during an administrative judge’s visit, questioning the legality of the action and demanding explanations.

Allahabad High Court Orders ASI Inspection of Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal for Whitewashing and Painting Approval

Allahabad: Today, 27th Feb, The Allahabad High Court instructed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to inspect the Shahi Jama Masjid in Sambhal to determine whether it requires whitewashing and painting. This decision came after the mosque management committee sought permission to carry out the maintenance work before Ramzan.

Supreme Court Slams Allahabad HC For Overstepping: “We Expect High Court To Act More Responsibly In Future”

The Supreme Court criticized the Allahabad High Court for passing interim orders in a food distribution case despite the matter being under its review. It set aside all such orders and allowed the Uttar Pradesh government to continue the scheme while ensuring quality.

Advocate Praveen Kumar Giri Appointed as Additional Judge of Allahabad High Court

Advocate Pravin Kumar Giri has been appointed as an Additional Judge of the Allahabad High Court, as announced by the Ministry of Law and Justice on January 23, 2025. A distinguished lawyer specializing in criminal law, Giri previously served as Additional Advocate General and comes from a family with a legacy of service in the military.

Allahabad High Court Curtails UP Police’s Power to Maintain Class-B History Sheets | Upholds Natural Justice Principles

On January 21, 2025, the Allahabad High Court limited the Uttar Pradesh Police’s power to maintain Class-B history sheets against individuals, reinforcing natural justice principles. The court emphasized the need for individuals to object before surveillance and mandated annual reviews, reflecting a shift toward transparency and accountability in police practices and protecting fundamental rights.

Mohammed Zubair Row | “Whatever Yati Narsinghanand Says, You Cannot Go to Social Media”: Allahabad HC On Free Speech

Today, On 18th December, During hearing on Alt-News Co-founder Mohammed Zubair’s plea, the Allahabad High Court stated, “Whatever Yati Narsinghanand says, you cannot go to social media.” Zubair is challenging an FIR that accuses him of promoting enmity through a post on ‘X.’ The court highlighted the importance of addressing grievances through legal avenues instead of social media. The case focuses on finding a balance between free speech and its potential misuse in inciting public unrest.