The Supreme Court is deliberating on mandating colour-coded stickers for vehicles to improve air quality monitoring and compliance. A bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan questioned the implementation of stringent GRAP-4 (Graded Response Action Plan) measures amid worsening AQI levels in Delhi. The court is examining how such measures can curb pollution effectively. Rising air pollution remains a critical concern for the capital city.
The Supreme Court of India summoned Delhi’s Chief Secretary for a December 19 appearance due to inadequate enforcement of the Solid Waste Management Rules 2016. The court threatened contempt action if compliance with prior orders isn’t reported. Concerns extend to air quality management, urging immediate government action on pollution sources, including stubble burning.
Delhi schools have been directed to adopt a “hybrid mode” of learning—combining online and physical classes—due to Supreme Court recommendations amid air quality concerns. This shift addresses educational disruptions, ensuring students can access mid-day meals and accommodate varying resources for online learning, with compliance mandated by the Directorate of Education.
Today, On 25th November, the Supreme Court instructed the Commission for Air Quality Management to evaluate whether physical classes for Standards 10 and 12 in Delhi-NCR can continue amidst rising air pollution. The Court focused on balancing student health and academic needs while highlighting the importance of mid-day meals and the lack of access to clean air at home.
Today, On 18th November, the Supreme Court mandated the continuation of Stage 4 anti-pollution measures in Delhi under the Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP IV) due to severe air quality. The court criticized the central air quality commission for delays and indicated it would not lower the measures even if the air quality improves.
Today, On 18th November, the Supreme Court will hear a case about Delhi’s severe pollution levels, questioning why the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) failed to implement necessary measures. The court emphasized the right to a pollution-free environment and criticized authorities for inaction amid worsening air quality, highlighting concerns over environmental health.
