• Thu. Feb 5th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi

    “File Intervention Application If You Have New Grounds"
    “File Intervention Application If You Have New Grounds"
    Supreme Court

    Waqf Amendment Act Challenge | “We Will Not Appoint Non-Muslims To Waqf Boards, De-Notify Existing Waqf For Now”: Centre Tells Supreme Court

    Today, On 17th April, The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it will not appoint non-Muslims to Waqf boards and will de-notify existing Waqfs for the time being. This statement came during the ongoing challenge to the Waqf Amendment Act, as the government assured no changes will occur until further directions from the court.

    author
    CJI Khanna's One Controversial Verdict During His Tenure: The Waqf Act Amendment 2025 Explained
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Waqf Amendment Act Challenge, Day 2 | “No Waqf Appointments, No Change In Status Until Next Hearing”: Centre to Supreme Court

    Today, On 17th April, The Centre assured the Supreme Court that there will be “no Waqf appointments, no change in status until the next hearing,” and confirmed that no non-Muslims would be appointed to Waqf boards for now.

    author
    Kapil Sibal Slams Waqf Law 2025 In Supreme Court: "State Officer Acting as Judge in Own Cause Is Unconstitutional"
    Kapil Sibal Slams Waqf Law 2025 In Supreme Court: "State Officer Acting as Judge in Own Cause Is Unconstitutional"
    Supreme Court

    Kapil Sibal Slams Waqf Law 2025 In Supreme Court: “State Officer Acting as Judge in Own Cause Is Unconstitutional”

    Today, On 16th April, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing before the Supreme Court, strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said allowing a state-appointed Collector to decide if a property is waqf makes the officer a “judge in his own cause”, which is unconstitutional.

    author
    Waqf Row | “When We Sit Here, We Lose Our Religion”: CJI Khanna Hits Back When SG Mehta Says "Your Lordships Cannot Hear This Case"
    Waqf Row | “When We Sit Here, We Lose Our Religion”: CJI Khanna Hits Back When SG Mehta Says "Your Lordships Cannot Hear This Case"
    Supreme Court

    Waqf Row | “When We Sit Here, We Lose Our Religion”: CJI Khanna Hits Back When SG Mehta Says “Your Lordships Cannot Hear This Case”

    Today, On 16th April, During the Waqf Amendment Act hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s remark” Then this bench also cannot hear the case” created a sharp response from the Supreme Court, which questioned the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf bodies and pressed the Centre for clarity.

    author
    [Centre Vs. Supreme Court] How the Centre Pre-Empted Adverse Supreme Court Orders: Waqf Act, Sedition Law & Article 370 Cases Explained
    Supreme Court

    Waqf Amendment Act | “Undoing ‘Waqf by User’ Will Create Problems”: Supreme Court

    Today, On 16th April, The Supreme Court, while examining the Waqf Amendment Act, remarked that undoing the concept of ‘waqf by user’ would create huge problems. The Court highlighted the serious impact but did not grant interim relief.

    author
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | “Not Considering Stay (of the Act)”: CJI Khanna Over Waqf Amendment Act Challenge

    Today, On 16th April, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna clarified during the hearing that the Supreme Court is “not considering stay (of the Act)” at this stage. The bench will first examine the legal and constitutional issues before deciding on any interim relief.

    author