AI Has the Transformative Potential to Ease India’s Judicial Backlog of Cheque Dishonour Cases: Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud

Ex-CJI DY Chandrachud emphasized that AI has transformative potential, capable of revolutionizing India’s justice system by automating high-volume cheque dishonour cases. He believes AI-enabled adjudication can cut delays, reduce pendency, and enhance judicial efficiency without compromising fairness.

AI and Personality Rights: Bollywood’s Legal Battle to Protect Celebrity Identity and Likeness

As AI recreates celebrity voices, faces, and personas, Bollywood stars fight legal battles to protect their personality rights. Courts are increasingly stepping in to curb deepfakes, unauthorized endorsements, and digital exploitation of celebrity identities.

Administrative Tribunals Occupy a Unique Space Between Executive and Judiciary: CJI Gavai

Today, On 20th September, At the 10th All India Conference of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai highlighted the vital role of tribunals. He said administrative tribunals occupy a unique space between the executive and the judiciary in India.

CJI BR Gavai Warns Against AI: “Law Is Not An Algorithm. Tech Must Not Replace Human Fairness In Courts”

CJI BR Gavai warns that overreliance on technology in courts can harm public trust. He calls for global cooperation and careful court oversight of AI and digital tools in justice delivery.

Supreme Court: “Worried That AI Should Not Eliminate the Employment of Drivers”

Today, On 22nd April, the Supreme Court expressed concerns regarding AI’s potential to displace drivers, leading to job losses, during a hearing about Electric Vehicle promotion policies in India. Justices highlighted the importance of balancing technological advancement with employment, underscoring the need for effective implementation of EV policies and infrastructure development.

Justice Surya Kant Warns Lawyers on AI Over-Use in Legal Drafting: “Technology Can Never Replace Human Intuition”

Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant warned young lawyers against excessive reliance on AI and copy-pasting in legal drafting. He emphasized that AI tools should assist rather than replace critical thinking and originality in legal writing. Overdependence on technology, he noted, could weaken analytical skills and professional growth. Justice Kant urged budding lawyers to focus on research, reasoning, and in-depth understanding to excel in the legal field.

Supreme Court of India Uses AI for Speed & Case Management, Not Judgments – Law Minister Meghwal

The Supreme Court is using AI and ML to manage cases and transcribe hearings, not to make decisions. Law Minister confirms AI won’t be used for judgments or legal predictions.

Former CJI Chandrachud: ‘Journalist’s Work Does Not Just Inform; It Fortifies Very Foundation Of Democracy’

“A journalist’s work does not just inform; it fortifies the very foundation of democracy,” said former Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud on Wednesday. He spoke at the 25th Business Standard-Seema Nazareth Award for Excellence in Journalism, 2024 about how journalism plays a crucial role in society. While delivering the keynote address on the topic “Journalism as the mainstay of democracy,” Chandrachud highlighted the importance of journalists in keeping people informed.

Delhi High Court Asks Police: “Can AI Help Find Missing Persons?”

The Delhi High Court questioned whether AI technology can assist the Delhi Police in tracking missing people, especially those with medical conditions. The court has directed the police to use AI and submit a fresh report.

AI in Judiciary || SC Justice B R Gavai Raises Concerns : “AI Should Assist Judges, Not Replace Them”

Supreme Court Judge Justice Gavai raised concerns about AI’s role in the judiciary, warning that it can generate fake case citations. He emphasized that while technology has improved access to judicial proceedings, it also brings ethical challenges. Justice Gavai cautioned against AI replacing human judgment in legal matters. His remarks highlight the need for careful regulation of AI in the justice system.