Today, On 10th July, The National Testing Agency (NTA) submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court regarding the NEET paper leak case, detailing the incident and measures taken. It reveals the clandestine acquisition of the exam paper and subsequent use for dishonest purposes. The NTA asserts that the malpractices did not compromise the exam’s integrity. The Supreme Court continues to deliberate on the matter. These developments unfold amidst the NTA’s efforts to identify and take action against those involved in the leak.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) on Friday opposes the cancellation of the NEET UG exam, citing isolated incidents of malpractice and arguing that canceling the entire exam would harm the interests of honest candidates. They emphasized the fair conduct of the exam and highlighted measures taken to ensure its integrity. The controversy is under Supreme Court scrutiny.
The Indian Medical Association’s Chief, Dr. R V Asokan, publicly apologized for remarks made about the Supreme Court, clarifying that he meant no disrespect. This followed the Court’s comments during a case involving misleading advertisements. The IMA has filed a petition against such ads and emphasizes the priority of promoting ethical practices within the association.
Justices Ajay Gadkari and Neela Gokhale condemned the conduct of Sudhir Pawar and the court registry, ordering an inquiry into the juvenile court’s functioning in Bhiwandi. They criticized Pawar for refusing to accept a chargesheet without the juvenile’s presence and found the presiding officer’s control over the court questionable. The High Court permitted the police to file the chargesheet promptly.
The Supreme Court Today (May 14th) said that it was not convinced by the apology affidavit submitted by Indian Medical Assocation (IMA) President Dr RV Asokan over his comments criticising the Court in an interview.
On Thursday( 9th May), Delhi CM Kejriwal’s interim bail plea is met with opposition from the ED, prompting his legal team to protest the affidavit’s unapproved submission in the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government on 6th May, for requiring the wife of the district magistrate of Bulandshahr to serve as the president of registered societies in the district. The court denounced the norm as “atrocious” and “humiliating for all women,” questioning its relevance and practicality in today’s society. It raised concerns about gender bias and the state’s endorsement of such a practice. Additionally, it rejected the concept of spousal proxy presidents and urged the state’s women and child development department to justify the propriety and legality of the regulation. This issue arose from a dispute related to Bulandshahr’s Zila Mahila Samiti, and the case has raised questions about the state’s endorsement and approval of certain regulations.
The Allahabad High Court has questioned whether government servants are allowed to communicate with the media freely. Justice JJ Munir has asked the State government to clarify if there are any restrictions in the service rules and directed the Department of Personnel to outline measures for training younger government servants to avoid impromptu media interactions if such restrictions exist.
On Wednesday (24th April): Arvind Kejriwal’s plea challenging his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) was contested in the Supreme Court, with the agency citing his non-cooperation during the investigation. The ED maintains that Kejriwal’s behaviour warranted his arrest, while the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) accuses the ED of falsehoods and serving the interests of the BJP. Kejriwal is in judicial custody at Tihar jail.
