The Supreme Court Today (April 29) again refused to accept a fresh petition challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The bench urged petitioners to follow due process, saying, “We will hear all.”
Today, On 28th April, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the petitioner, emphasized the need for stricter regulations as the Supreme Court issued a notice to the Centre, OTTs, and social media platforms, stating, “Court observed that this is a serious issue.”
Today, On 28th April, The Supreme Court issued notices to the Centre and OTT platforms like Netflix, stressing, “Netflix etc. too have social responsibility,” while hearing a plea raising concerns over the rise of obscene content on digital platforms.
The Supreme Court Today (April 28) declined to hear a fresh plea against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, asking the petitioner to join existing cases. Only five petitions will be considered on May 5 for interim orders.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain Today (April 21) requested urgent action in West Bengal, calling for paramilitary forces and emergency rule due to Anti-Waqf Protests. Justice B.R. Gavai responded firmly, highlighting limits of judicial power.
The Supreme Court has decided to hear five main petitions challenging the Waqf Amendment Act. It clarified that all other similar petitions filed across the country will be treated as intervention or impleadment applications in these five cases. This move aims to streamline the legal proceedings on the controversial Waqf law.
In Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, three broken idols, including one of Lord Ganesh, were discovered while excavating a well near a temple that had been closed for 46 years. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain supports the significance of Sambhal as a pilgrimage site, while tensions arise following recent violence and complaints regarding threats related to the mosque-temple dispute.
Key Highlights from Supreme Court’s Recent Hearing The Supreme Court of India, while addressing a batch of petitions seeking measures to curb hate speeches, has made it clear that it will not entertain individual cases of violations. The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M Trivedi, emphasized their focus on establishing an infrastructure or […]
