Today, On 23rd September, the Calcutta High Court criticized West Bengal’s financial grant of Rs 85,000 to Durga Puja organizers as insufficient compared to other expenditures. Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam suggested raising it to Rs 10 lakh due to rising festival costs. The court emphasized accountability in fund utilization and highlighted ongoing financial concerns for marginalized workers.
![[Fake NCC Camp Rape] "School Should Have Vetted Any Individual/Organization They Hired For The Camp": HC Seeks Detailed Report on Deaths of Accused and His Father](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-403.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The West Bengal Government today has set up a seven-member committee, led by a retired judge of the Calcutta High Court, to review three new criminal laws that replaced the British-era laws on July 1. The committee, including state ministers, the advocate general, and police officials, will submit its findings within three months. West Bengal is the third state to amend these laws.
Today, On 15th July, The Maharashtra Advocate General informed the Supreme Court that the land for the new Bombay High Court building will be handed over by September 10. This ensures timely progress and marks a significant step forward in judicial infrastructure development. The next hearing is scheduled for August 22. The AG also stated that copies of the plan would be provided to the Presidents of the Bombay Bar Associations.
Today, On 14th June, The Calcutta High Court allowed Suvendu Adhikari and post-poll violence victims to visit Raj Bhavan after their initial entry was impeded by police. The court questioned the governor’s “house arrest” status and directed Adhikari to seek permission for the visit. Allegations and denials were presented, and the court ordered a fresh request for the visit.
On Thursday(6th June),The Calcutta High Court firmly cautioned the Trinamool Congress (TMC) government about ongoing post-election violence in West Bengal, directing the Bengal Police to promptly intervene. Justices Kaushik Chanda and Apurba Sinha, on the bench, expressed grave apprehensions regarding the state’s law and order situation.
Today, On 23rd May, The Madras High Court mandated full disclosure of files related to the detention of journalist Savukku Shankar under the Goondas Act. This move emphasizes transparency and highlights the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights against arbitrary state actions. The court refrained from the usual order of directing a notice, insisting on personally reviewing the entire file.
The Supreme Court of India reiterated its prohibition of the ‘two-finger test’ in rape cases, emphasizing its unscientific nature and violation of women’s dignity. Despite legal bans and guidelines, the test persists, highlighting the need for greater enforcement and survivor-centered care. The court instructed states to ensure comprehensive prohibition of this practice.
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt case against the Advocate General and Additional Advocate General due to procedural irregularities. The case arose from alleged misconduct during a virtual hearing. The court stressed the importance of upholding decorum in legal proceedings and highlighted the need for adherence to procedural guidelines. The dismissal drew attention to maintaining the rule of law in court.
![[Nagaland Reservation Policy] 33% Reservation for Women in Nagaland Finally Approved](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-86.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Nagaland approved a 33% reservation for women in municipal and town council elections, after a 15-year legal battle. Despite opposition, the Supreme Court upheld this constitutional mandate. The state government repeatedly postponed elections, defying court orders. This decision marks a significant step towards empowering women and promoting gender equality in the region.