Today, On 9th May, The Supreme Court considered a PIL seeking to replace the 5-year LL.B course with a 4-year one, arguing that the National Education Policy 2020 supports four-year professional undergraduate programmes.
A PIL in the Supreme Court challenges the unreasonable 5-year B. Law course, alleging it was set under pressure from private college managements. It seeks a review of the curriculum and course duration by the Legal Education Commission.
Today 4th April, A recent plea in the Supreme Court emphasizes that the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) aims to protect persecuted non-Muslim minorities from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh. The plea argues that the CAA does not violate any fundamental rights and requests the rejection of a petition challenging its constitutionality. The Supreme Court is set to hear petitions against the CAA on April 9.
A BJP leader’s PIL in the Delhi High Court seeks privacy protections for individuals’ data collected by travel companies, emphasizing concerns over confidentiality. The petition highlights the potential misuse of sensitive information by foreign-owned travel companies and underscores the need for adherence to the DPDP Act 2023 to safeguard citizens’ rights.
Delhi High Court Declines to Direct Legislature on Uniform Civil Code, Citing Supreme Court Precedent and Law Commission’s Role In a recent judicial development, the Delhi High Court has chosen not to proceed with a series of petitions advocating for the establishment and implementation of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) across India. This decision aligns […]
