The Delhi High Court criticized the DDA for delaying an advocate’s rightful fees, stressing that public bodies must act honourably. The court said such conduct undermines the rule of law and damages the sanctity of the lawyer-client relationship.
Today, On 19th March, The Supreme Court ruled that only the arguing counsel, the advocate-on-record (AoR), and one assisting counsel can have their names officially recorded. Additionally, the Court emphasized that a Senior Counsel cannot appear without an advocate-on-record. This decision aims to maintain procedural discipline in court proceedings. The ruling clarifies the hierarchy and roles of legal representatives before the apex court.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna highlighted the vital role of Advocates-on-Record (AORs) in the legal system, urging them to balance professional and social responsibilities. He advised new AORs to take up cases that sustain their livelihood while also contributing to society. The Supreme Court, he emphasized, holds high expectations from them. His remarks highlighted the importance of legal service beyond personal gain.
NEW DELHI: On February 6, 2025, the Supreme Court of India postponed the hearing on the bail pleas of advocate Surendra Gadling and activist Jyoti Jagtap, who were arrested in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. The bench, consisting of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal, also deferred the hearing on a petition filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) challenging the bail granted to activist Mahesh Raut by the Bombay High Court.
The Supreme Court directed newly designated Senior Advocates to inform their clients about their senior status. This move aims to ensure transparency and awareness among litigants. The designation comes with added responsibilities and higher fees, making disclosure crucial. The court’s directive reinforces ethical legal practices.
