Pan Masala Ad Case| Salman Khan Must Appear In Person: Kota Consumer Court Orders

Salman Khan has been directed by the Kota consumer court to appear in person in the ongoing pan masala advertisement case. The court has also sought forensic examination of the power of attorney signature submitted on his behalf.

Salman Khan Is a Role Model, Should Not Promote Pan Masala: Complaint Filed in Consumer Court

A complaint has been filed in the Kota Consumer Court against Bollywood actor Salman Khan over his pan masala advertisement, alleging that as a role model, he should not promote such products that send a wrong message to the youth.

Hindustan Unilever Ltd To Delhi HC: “Will Remove Lakme Sunscreen Ad Within 24 Hours”

Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) informed the Delhi High Court that it will take down the Lakme sunscreen advertisement that allegedly disparages The Derma Co. The company assured the Court it will remove all online posts within 24 hours and take down physical hoardings within 48 hours.

Court Fines Tonique for Charging Customer for Branded Carry Bag: “Unprofessional & Unfair”

A Bengaluru court fined Tonique for charging a customer for a carry bag that had the store’s branding. The court called the act “unprofessional and unfair,” stating that customers should not be made to pay for unsolicited advertising. Tonique was also directed to pay Rs. 5,000 as compensation to the customer.

Delhi HC Dismissed Plea Against Appointment of NSIDC Chairman

The Delhi High Court today dismissed a PIL challenging the appointment of Subhransu Sekhar Acharya as Chairman-cum-Managing Director of NSIDC, stating that a PIL is not maintainable in service matters and only non-appointees can challenge the legality of an appointment or extension procedure. The court clarified that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the issues raised in the petition.

IMA vs. UOI | Supreme Court Levies Rs.10,000 Fine on Intervention Applicant for Alleged Proxy Litigation in ‘Patanjali Case’

The Supreme Court fined an intervention applicant Rs.10,000 for attempting to join a case against Patanjali Ayurved with misleading claims. The applicant alleged a quack doctor’s role in their mother’s death, but the court dismissed the application, warning against manipulating the legal process. Patanjali faced criticism for misleading advertisements and offered an unconditional apology.