The Madras High Court has ruled that grandparents can legally execute an adoption if the biological mother consents, affirming that such adoptions remain valid under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, despite bureaucratic objections.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that the date of adoption, rather than formal registration, determines legal recognition under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. In the case of Prema Gopal, the court emphasized that adoption is valid from the actual ceremony date, preventing procedural delays from undermining its legal status. This landmark decision impacts inter-country adoptions.
The Supreme Court ruled that an adopted child cannot contest transactions made by a Hindu widow before adoption. It affirmed the widow’s ownership rights under the Hindu Succession Act, validating a 2007 sale deed while voiding a 2008 gift deed due to improper execution. The court emphasized that an adopted child cannot divest prior estates.
Kalpana Das Chandrachud, wife of Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, reflects on her inclusive childhood in Kerala, celebrating various religious festivals without discrimination. She completed her education in Kasaragod and married in 2008, choosing to wear only her wedding ring. The couple adopted two special needs children, enriching their family life.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will hear Dr. K.A. Paul’s petition regarding the Tirupati laddu controversy on November 22. The case involves allegations of adulteration in the sacred prasadam, causing distress among Hindus. An independent Special Investigation Team has been ordered to ensure a thorough inquiry into the claims of compromised quality.
During the Rajasthan High Court’s platinum jubilee celebrations, Prime Minister Modi emphasized the judiciary’s backing for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), seen as a secular alternative to personal laws. The Supreme Court noted the government’s consideration of a UCC draft. The case involves a Muslim woman seeking to exit Sharia law for inheritance rights.
The Supreme Court of India expressed concern about single women using surrogacy, highlighting the societal norm of motherhood within marriage. They suggested alternatives like marriage or adoption, emphasizing the welfare of children. The court’s stance sparked discussions about reproductive rights and societal norms. The petitioner’s lawyer argued that the surrogacy law’s limits violated fundamental rights.
