The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking negative marking in the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) and criticized petitioner stating, “The difficulty is you read the newspaper in the morning and whatever catches your imagination becomes the subject matter of a PIL.”
The Delhi High Court has ordered re-training for a Family Court judge who invented a provision to grant a divorce decree. It said, “The manner in which the judge conducted proceedings disturbs judicial conscience and threatens the integrity of justice.”
The Delhi High Court initiated contempt proceedings against a lawyer for making allegations of a ‘corrupt judiciary.’ The court described the claims as reckless, contemptuous, and scandalous, emphasizing that such statements undermine the integrity of the judicial system.
Today, On 25th June, The Supreme Court took suo motu notice after a lawyer was summoned by Gujarat Police over his client’s case. It said such actions are a “direct threat to the administration of justice” and harm legal independence.
Today, On 11th February, The Calcutta High Court emphasized that corruption in influential positions significantly undermines public confidence while hearing the RG Kar case. The court stressed the need for transparency and accountability in governance to maintain trust in public institutions. Allegations of corruption in the case have raised concerns over ethical misconduct in administrative affairs. The court’s remarks highlight the broader impact of corruption on society and the justice system.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court upheld that fair reporting of court judgments is crucial for justice and press freedom, shielding journalists from contempt charges. This ruling highlights the press’s essential function in promoting transparency and accountability in state actions and judicial outcomes.
In response to soaring temperatures in Delhi, several High Courts have temporarily exempted lawyers from wearing their traditional robes and coats. This move, prompted by extreme heat, aims to improve working conditions. There is a push for the Supreme Court to implement this relaxation nationwide. The situation underscores the need for adaptive measures in the legal system.
Today(on 16th May),The Supreme Court ordered Delhi and three other states to cease new mining permissions in the Aravalli range without its approval, and has also rebuked the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for unauthorized tree cutting in the Ridge area, an extension of the Aravallis.
The Karnataka High Court is proposing an amendment to its rules to give the Chief Justice the power to suspend advocates involved in court boycotts. This is part of the “rules laying down the conditions subject to which an advocate shall be permitted to practice in the High Court and the courts subordinate thereto (Amendment) Rules, 2024.” Additionally, the Grievance Redressal Committee will address grievances related to strikes and boycotts by advocates.
