Today, On 25th July, The Delhi High Court rejected the request to stop the streaming of the Netflix documentary “To Kill a Tiger,” which depicts a family’s pursuit of justice for their 13-year-old gang-rape victim daughter. The court issued notices to the government, Netflix, and the director, seeking responses within four weeks to allegations of violating the minor’s identity protection laws.
The Delhi High Court on 22nd july has sought the Central Government’s response on a PIL challenging the requirement of a ration card under the Rashtriya Arogya Nidhi (RAN) umbrella scheme. The petitioner seeks relaxation of this requirement, arguing it is arbitrary and deprives destitute patients of financial aid. The detailed hearing is scheduled for November 25, 2024.
A high-level committee, established today by the Union Ministry of Civil Aviation, will investigate the roof collapse at Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport. The government also directed airport operators to conduct third-party audits and thorough evaluations of airport buildings annually. The Delhi High Court closed the public interest litigation following the Centre’s response and measures taken.
Today, On 15th July, The Delhi High Court demanded an urgent response from the government to address a petition concerning the rescue of over 1,000 minors allegedly trafficked and forced into bonded labor in Delhi. The petition emphasizes the critical need for prompt intervention to protect these vulnerable children, highlighting the government’s duty to take urgent action within 24 to 48 hours of receiving complaints.
The Delhi High Court upheld a law mandating 50% coverage of health warnings on pan masala packaging to inform consumers about its harmful effects. The ruling aimed to promote public health and increase consumer awareness. The Court dismissed a plea by a pan masala company, emphasizing the regulation’s proportionate nature and its alignment with public interest.
The Delhi High Court ruled that the Supreme Court collegium’s reasons for rejecting judgeship candidates should remain confidential, as disclosure could harm the candidates. The court emphasized that the High Court cannot challenge the Supreme Court’s decisions. The Division Bench dismissed an appeal, advising the petitioner to seek early hearing if his cases were being delayed.
Today(on 2nd July), Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud highlighted the courts’ role as public service providers, serving the Constitution and litigants. The event, attended by dignitaries, emphasized inclusivity in new court buildings and the judiciary’s foundational principles. Various speakers, including Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, Justice Hima Kohli, and Atishi Marlena, praised the focus on judicial infrastructure.
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud laid foundation stones for new court buildings in Karkardooma, Shastri Park, and Rohini (Sector 26) court complexes in Delhi, alongside other Supreme Court judges. These buildings are dedicated to the public, aiming to provide justice to the citizens of Delhi and beyond.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking BCCI and Delhi Capitals to pay for IPL security expenses, citing the absence of an agreed fee for security services during matches. The petitioner pointed to previous cases in Mumbai and Jaipur, but the court deemed it a policy decision, concluding no outstanding dues. The decision allows Delhi Police to levy fees in the future.
Today, On 15th May, The Delhi High Court warned the Delhi government over delayed textbook distribution in government schools, threatening contempt action. The government pledged to deliver textbooks by May 10 but failed, prompting the court’s criticism. Despite refraining from immediate action, the court demanded timely textbook supply to all schools and a compliance report on corrective measures.