The Delhi High Court told the Central Government to look into a petition asking for urgent laws to stop sexual violence against animals. FIAPO says animals are now legally unprotected after Section 377 was removed from Indian law.
The Supreme Court will hear 10 major petitions Today (April 16) challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Petitioners argue the law violates Muslim rights and the Indian Constitution.
The Supreme Court will hear 10 major petitions on April 16 challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Petitioners argue the law violates Muslim rights and the Indian Constitution.
IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw confirms a new Aadhaar law is on the way. It will align with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 to better protect user data.
The Supreme Court Today (April 7) agreed to list multiple petitions opposing the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The new law brings major changes to waqf property rules, sparking legal and public debate.
The Bombay High Court Today (Feb 21) directed the Maharashtra government to quickly address staff shortages, warning that court functioning is severely affected. Judges emphasized the urgent need for skilled staff to handle digital case management.
The Supreme Court Today (Feb 21) withdrew its 10-day probe order against MLA Abbas Ansari and asked UP Police for a status report on pending investigations before deciding on his bail plea.
The Supreme Court Today (Feb 21) ordered UP Police to complete the probe against MLA Abbas Ansari in 10 days. His bail plea will be considered only after the investigation is done.
The Supreme Court criticized the Allahabad High Court for passing interim orders in a food distribution case despite the matter being under its review. It set aside all such orders and allowed the Uttar Pradesh government to continue the scheme while ensuring quality.
The Supreme Court Today (Jan 31) canceled a case against a man booked under the SC/ST Act, ruling that the alleged caste-based abuse did not happen in public view. The court stated that for an offense under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Act, the insult or abuse must occur in a place where the public can see or hear it. Since the incident happened inside the complainant’s office chamber, the case did not hold legal ground. The court set aside the Madras High Court’s order and quashed all proceedings.
