A Delhi court Today (June 7th) adjourned the bail plea filed by arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till June 14.
![[EXCLUSIVE] Chronology of Events: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Screenshot-2024-06-06-111324.png?resize=447%2C358&ssl=1)
A Delhi court said on Wednesday that extensive election campaigning and meetings done by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal during the recently concluded Lok Sabha polls shows that he is not suffering from any serious or life-threatening ailments and he is not entitled to interim bail under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Today(on 5th June), The Delhi High Court has emphasized AAP’s entitlement to office space in the national capital and has directed the Centre to decide within six weeks. Justice Prasad stressed fairness, rejecting denial based on “pressure” or other grounds. The ruling reflects a commitment to equal treatment of political parties in logistical support from the state.
A Delhi court postponed the review of the Enforcement Directorate’s chargesheet against Arvind Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party in the Excise PMLA case to July 9. The ED sought an extension of Kejriwal’s judicial custody, with the court reserving its decision on the matter. The court also dismissed Kejriwal’s plea for release.
![[Breaking] Excise Policy case: Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-44.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court denied bail to businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall in the Delhi Excise Scam case, citing the seriousness of the allegations, risk of tampering with evidence, and influencing witnesses. The court also pointed to the potential impact on society. The case involves allegations of bribery and irregularities in the Delhi excise policy.
![[Excise Policy CBI Case] Delhi Court Orders Medical Check-Up for BRS Leader K Kavitha at AIIMS](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-17-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 3rd June, The Enforcement Directorate (ED) alleged that K Kavitha, a Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader, paid Rs 292 crore in bribes to Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders regarding the Delhi liquor policy. Kavitha is accused of destroying evidence and is in custody. The case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in Indian politics.
![[Breaking] Liquor Policy Scam: Delhi Court Remands BRS leader Kavitha Till July 3](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Delhi Court today extends BRS leader K Kavitha’s custody till July 3 in the liquor policy scam case. Three co-accused were granted bail. Kavitha, daughter of former Telangana CM, is accused of involvement in a corruption and money laundering case related to Delhi’s excise policy. The case alleges favoritism and diversion of funds.
![[BREAKING] Arvind Kejriwal Granted Bail by Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-28.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 2n June, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal surrendered at Tihar Jail, ending his interim bail granted by the Supreme Court. He criticized exit polls as fake and expressed gratitude to the court. The Aam Aadmi Party leader was released earlier for election campaigning. Kejriwal visited religious sites before returning to jail and expressed commitment to serving the nation.
![[Breaking] Delhi Excise Policy Scam: ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail Plea In Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-414.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is slated to return to Tihar Jail on June 2, as a local court has deferred the decision on his interim bail plea until June 5. The plea, filed by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), cites medical reasons and requests a week-long interim bail for Kejriwal. This comes in connection with his arrest in an alleged money laundering case related to the previously annulled liquor policy.