The Supreme Court today(26th Sept) confirmed that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, applies to all women in India, safeguarding their constitutional rights. The ruling stemmed from a case concerning maintenance, emphasizing that modifications under Section 25 are only applicable for changes post-initial orders. Previous appeals were dismissed, allowing for future applications under the Act.
![[Breaking]‘Ignores Macro-Economic Impact’: Centre Seeks Review of Supreme Court’s 8:1 Ruling Upholding Power of States to Tax Minerals](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Mineral-Royalty-Case.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Government has requested the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling allowing states to tax mineral extraction, citing potential economic strain and undue burden on citizens. It argues for a uniform national system of mineral levies to ensure sustained economic growth and harmonized pricing. The plea highlights the impact on industrial growth and national development.
The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, today ruled on retrospective taxation of mining activities, allowing states to renew tax demands from April 1, 2005. The ruling recognizes states’ authority to tax mineral rights under List II, while emphasizing the need for balanced federalism. However, dissenting Justice Nagarathna expressed concerns about potential negative economic impacts.
Today, On 3rd May, The Supreme Court criticized the Madhya Pradesh government and directed the immediate appointment of a woman to a teaching position. The woman had passed the relevant examination in 2008 but had not been formally appointed. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 10 lakh. The decision emphasizes the importance of respecting legal procedures and ensuring gender representation in appointments.
