The Hindu petitioners on Monday in the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute argue that the Places of Worship Act does not apply to a disputed structure. They challenge the 1968 compromise and maintain that the suit is maintainable and that evidence needs to be presented. The lawsuit also revisits historical claims about the mosque’s existence. The legal and historical complexities are becoming more evident as the court postpones further discussions.
In a legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, Hindu representatives reported missing property documents, complicating the case. The Hindu side challenges the Waqf Board’s ownership claim and the alleged compromise. The Muslim side argues the suit is time-barred. The High Court scheduled the next hearing for May 20. The case continues to draw attention.
Today, On 15th May, The Shahi Idgah dispute took on a new dimension as Hindu parties accused the Sunni Waqf Board of fraudulent representation in a 1968 compromise. They contested the ownership of the disputed land and raised questions about the mosque committee’s authority. The case’s outcome could have far-reaching implications for religious site management and communal harmony.