The Supreme Court often emphasised that being a good lawyer is not just about knowing the law and reading cases. It also involves understanding the etiquette, procedures, and respectful conduct expected in a courtroom — which is referred to as “court craft.”
New Delhi, June 11 – The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns about the attitude and professionalism of the younger generation of lawyers.
On Wednesday, the top court expressed its disappointment after a young lawyer casually walked away while an order was being dictated in court.
A bench of Justices S V N Bhatti and P B Varale was hearing a matter when the incident occurred. The lawyer, appearing before the court, informed the bench that a letter had been circulated requesting an adjournment.
However, as the judges began dictating the order, she started walking away from the courtroom, which irked the judges.
Reacting to her behaviour, the bench remarked:
“The young generation does not want to learn the court craft. Reading cases is only 30 per cent, rest 70 per cent is court craft.”
The Supreme Court often emphasised that being a good lawyer is not just about knowing the law and reading cases. It also involves understanding the etiquette, procedures, and respectful conduct expected in a courtroom — which is referred to as “court craft.”
The bench’s sharp observation highlights a growing concern that many young legal professionals may be lacking in this crucial area of legal training. Walking away while a judge is dictating an order is seen as highly disrespectful and inappropriate.
What is “Court Craft”
In the court’s view, “court craft” includes a lawyer’s ability to:
- Present arguments effectively
- Respect courtroom decorum
- Observe body language and timing
- Be patient while orders are being passed
- Show courtesy to judges and fellow advocates
The bench clearly distinguished between academic knowledge and practical skills in the courtroom.
As stated “Reading cases is only 30 per cent, rest 70 per cent is court craft.”
