The Supreme Court is examining a plea from the SCBA and SCAORA for clarification on a September 2024 order that mandates recording only the names of lawyers actively arguing cases. During a hearing, Justice Bela Trivedi criticized the frequent adjournments requested, highlighting procedural concerns. The ruling could significantly affect documentation of legal representation in court.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court is reviewing a plea by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) seeking clarification on its September 2024 order, which mandates that only the names of lawyers arguing or appearing in a case be officially recorded.
During the hearing, senior advocate Kapil Sibal’s counsel requested a pass-over, stating,
Also Read: Supreme Court Deliberates on ED’s Authority in Tamil Nadu District Collectors’ Summoning
“Mr. Sibal is currently presenting in this court. Kindly pass over; I will need to seek instructions.”
However, Justice Bela Trivedi expressed displeasure, questioning the frequency of adjournments. She remarked,
“How often do we adjourn like this? When was it last heard? Last Thursday, you also sought an adjournment. This is unacceptable.”
Despite the concerns raised, the bench ultimately agreed to adjourn the matter.
The plea by SCBA and SCAORA seeks clarity on whether the September 2024 order restricts recording names only to those who argue cases or if it includes all representing lawyers. The decision on this matter could impact how legal representation is documented in court proceedings.
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE
