A Delhi High Court ruling has enabled Harbir Kaur and Gurvinder Singh to access their deceased son’s frozen semen for surrogacy after a four-year legal battle. The decision highlights the absence of explicit prohibitions in Indian law regarding posthumous reproduction, offering hope for grieving families and setting a significant legal precedent in India.
New Delhi: In a groundbreaking decision, a Delhi High Court ruling has brought renewed hope to a grieving Indian couple. After a protracted four-year legal battle, Harbir Kaur and Gurvinder Singh have been granted access to their deceased son’s frozen semen, paving the way for them to have a grandchild through surrogacy. The ruling is being hailed as a landmark in India, igniting discussions about posthumous reproduction and the rights of parents.
A Heartbreaking Loss, A Long Legal Battle
The story began in June 2020 when the couple’s son, 30-year-old Preet Inder Singh, was diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, a form of blood cancer. Heeding medical advice, Preet Inder froze his semen at Delhi’s Ganga Ram Hospital before undergoing chemotherapy. Tragically, he succumbed to the illness in September of the same year, leaving his family devastated.
Months later, the bereaved parents approached the hospital for access to their son’s semen, only to be met with refusal. The hospital cited a lack of legal guidelines governing the release of semen samples in such circumstances. Determined to carry on their son’s legacy, the couple turned to the Delhi High Court in 2020 to secure the right to use his semen for surrogacy.
Harbir Kaur said after Court’s ruling,
“We were very unlucky, we lost our son. But the court has given us a very precious gift. We would now be able to get our son back,”
The Court’s Groundbreaking Verdict
Justice Prathiba Singh’s ruling, delivered in October 2024, underscored that there is no explicit prohibition under Indian law against posthumous reproduction, provided there is clear consent from the deceased. In this case, the court accepted that Preet Inder’s intent to preserve his semen for IVF purposes, documented in the hospital’s records, constituted implied consent.
Read Also: India’s Surrogacy Regulations Evolve: Government Amends Rules to Allow Donor Gametes
Since Preet Inder was unmarried and had no children, the court ruled that his parents, as his legal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, were entitled to access his semen sample. Justice Singh’s decision aligns with a few precedents globally but marks a rare instance in Indian legal history.
The case brings to light the complexity of Indian reproductive laws. The hospital had refused to release the semen, stating that they could only hand it over to a spouse. The Indian government also initially opposed the petition, arguing that the country’s surrogacy laws are designed to assist infertile couples, not grandparents who wish to have grandchildren. However, the court sided with the parents, providing a ray of hope for many who have faced similar tragedies.
A Quest to Continue Their Son’s Legacy
For Harbir Kaur and Gurvinder Singh, this victory means much more than just winning a legal battle. It represents the possibility of continuing their family line and preserving their son’s memory. The couple, both in their 60s, have expressed their commitment to raising the child born from this process and, in the event of their passing, their two daughters have pledged to take full responsibility for the child.
Kaur poignantly described the pain of losing her son, recounting how she starts every day by looking at his photograph on her phone’s screensaver. “He loved his sisters and was much loved by his friends,” she shared. “Now, we have a glimmer of hope, a light, that we will be able to bring our son back.”
Read Also: Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response on Exclusion of Transwomen from Surrogacy Law
The family plans to keep the surrogacy within their circle, with a relative agreeing to be the surrogate. This is especially important, as India’s strict surrogacy laws, revised in recent years, prohibit commercial surrogacy.
A Precedent with Global Parallels
While this case is rare in India, it isn’t without global precedent. Similar cases have occurred in countries like the US and Israel. Justice Singh, in her ruling, referenced a notable 2002 case from Israel, where parents of a soldier killed in Gaza were granted legal permission to use his sperm for surrogacy.
Globally, posthumous reproduction laws vary widely. Some countries, such as the US, UK, and Japan, allow posthumous reproduction with written consent, while nations like Italy, Sweden, and France prohibit the practice altogether. India, however, is still navigating these complex waters, as cases like this one continue to challenge the existing legal frameworks.
A New Dawn for Grieving Families
This landmark ruling offers a glimmer of hope for other grieving families who seek to preserve their loved ones’ legacies. While the battle was long and arduous for Harbir Kaur and Gurvinder Singh, their perseverance has not only granted them a second chance at happiness but has also set a significant legal precedent in India.
As India continues to navigate the ethics and legality of posthumous reproduction, this case will undoubtedly serve as a reference point, offering a compassionate solution to families grappling with the loss of a child.
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE
