Today, On 16th December, The Jaunpur Court is set to deliver its verdict , December 16, on a petition filed by the Swaraj Vahini Association seeking an Amin survey of the historic Atala Mosque. The case has drawn attention due to the Supreme Court’s December 12 directive, which prohibits courts from issuing orders for surveys of disputed sites. The mosque committee has highlighted this ruling as a key argument against the petition.
The Jaunpur Court is expected to deliver its verdict today, December 16, on a petition filed by the Swaraj Vahini Association, seeking an Amin survey of the historic Atala Mosque.
This case garnered significant attention due to the mosque committee referencing the Supreme Court’s December 12 directive, which clearly states that courts are “restrained from passing any effective interim or final orders, including orders for a survey.”
The Supreme Court’s ruling has become central to the case, with its directive prohibiting courts from issuing any orders that could lead to a survey or similar actions regarding the disputed site.
Read Also: Sambhal Mosque Dispute Reaches Supreme Court | CJI Led Bench To Hear Tomorrow!
The mosque committee has used this ruling as a key argument in its submissions to the Jaunpur Court.
The outcome of this case is being closely watched, as it could have significant implications. The court’s decision will have to carefully navigate the petition’s request for a survey while adhering to the Supreme Court’s binding restrictions.
The quotes,
“Restrained from passing any effective interim or final orders, including orders for a survey,”
It highlights the pivotal role of the Supreme Court’s judgment in influencing the course of this legal matter.
The case has been under legal review since the Jaunpur District Judge confirmed its maintainability on August 12 of this year. Previously, the Civil Judge of the district court registered the case on May 29 and commenced hearings. Santosh Kumar Mishra, the Uttar Pradesh President of the Swaraj Vahini Association, filed the original suit in the Jaunpur district court, asserting that the mosque is situated on the site of a demolished temple.
This case mirrors the ongoing controversy surrounding the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, where disputes related to surveys have escalated to the Supreme Court. As a result of the pending decision, hearings in the Allahabad High Court have also been postponed.
The Allahabad High Court scheduled to hold a separate hearing on December 16, during which the Swaraj Vahini organization will be required to submit its response.
The Atala Mosque case centers around a legal petition filed by the Swaraj Vahini Association, seeking an Amin survey of the historic mosque located in Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh.
The petition has gained significant attention due to its association with a disputed religious site, which has been at the heart of ongoing legal and religious debates.
Background of the Case
- The Petition: The Swaraj Vahini Association’s petition calls for an Amin survey (a land survey conducted by an official) of the Atala Mosque, which it claims will help clarify the historical and ownership status of the mosque and the land around it. This request, however, has sparked controversy, as it comes in the context of ongoing disputes regarding the mosque’s location and its historical significance.
- Supreme Court Ruling (December 12): The case has become even more contentious due to the Supreme Court’s ruling on December 12, which explicitly stated that all courts are “restrained from passing any effective interim or final orders, including orders for a survey” related to the disputed site. This ruling applies to various religious disputes, including those involving sites with claims from both Hindu and Muslim communities.
- The Mosque Committee’s Argument: The mosque’s management committee has pointed to this Supreme Court directive as a central argument against the request for an Amin survey. They argue that the directive restricts courts from issuing any orders that could lead to a survey, which they believe would interfere with the status quo.
- Implications of the Case: The decision in this case has significant legal and social implications. It could set a precedent for how courts handle religious disputes involving historical sites, especially those with competing claims. The outcome may also influence future legal cases concerning other disputed religious properties across India.
The Atala Mosque case, which brings together issues of religious sentiment, legal frameworks, and historical preservation, is being closely watched for its potential to impact not only the local community but also the broader legal discourse surrounding religious disputes in India.