LawChakra

Rabri Devi Seeks Transfer of CBI–ED Cases Against Her Family, Says Judge Vishal Gogne Is ‘Unduly Inclined Towards Prosecution’

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Rabri Devi has sought the transfer of all CBI and ED cases filed against her family, saying Judge Vishal Gogne is unduly inclined towards the prosecution. She claims a fair trial is impossible under the present circumstances now.

Former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi submitted a plea to the Principal District and Sessions Judge of the Rouse Avenue Courts, requesting the transfer of four cases from the judge who has framed charges against her and her family members in the alleged IRCTC scam.

In her application, Devi is seeking the transfer of these four cases pending before Judge Gogne, which include the IRCTC scam case, the alleged cash-for-jobs case, and related money laundering proceedings.

Earlier, On October 13, Judge Gogne framed criminal charges against Lalu Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi Yadav, and several others in the IRCTC scandal.

Rabri Devi has claimed that the judge demonstrates bias, alleging that he conducts the trials against her and her family with a “premeditated mind.”

Her plea states that the judge is “unduly inclined” toward the prosecution.

She argues,

“That the conduct of the Ld. Special Judge, on various occasions during the course of proceedings in all the above mentioned cases, appears to be unduly inclined towards the prosecution and bias which can be seen from a number of instances of the case proceedings/orders itself, which has created a reasonable apprehension of bias in the mind of the Applicant and in the interest of just, equity and fair play the cases needs to be transferred to some other court of the competent jurisdiction.”

According to Devi, the judge’s actions undermine the expected neutrality and have established a “reasonable likelihood of bias” in her view.

She emphasizes that her concerns are grounded in specific incidents that have occurred during the proceedings in the cases where she is an accused.

Senior Advocate Maninder Singh represented Devi and informed Judge Gogne that an application has been submitted and will likely be addressed soon.

In the IRCTC case, the CBI claims that Lalu Yadav and his family accepted prime land and shares as bribes for awarding contracts to a private firm while he was the Union Railway Minister. Charges have been framed against the Yadav family in this matter.

Additionally, the cash-for-jobs case alleges that during Lalu Yadav’s tenure, various residents of Bihar were granted jobs after transferring their land to Yadav and his family members.

The ED is pursuing allegations of money laundering against Yadav and his family in connection with these cases.



Exit mobile version