Judge Reeta Kaushik gets promoted despite serious allegations by Atul Subhash of a Rs 3 crore bribe. Controversy grows as the media faces restrictions and legal notices over reporting.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
UTTAR PRADESH: In a development that has led to nationwide debate, Judge Reeta Kaushik, accused in Atul Subhash’s suicide note of allegedly demanding a ₹3 crore bribe, has recently been promoted to District Judge on 6th June, 2025.
In his 24-page suicide note and video, Atul Subhash accused Family Court Judge Reeta Kaushik of demanding a ₹5 lakh bribe for a favourable decision, while a court clerk allegedly demanded ₹3 lakh to schedule hearings. This case gained national attention because it exposed alleged corruption within the judiciary, a sector traditionally considered sacrosanct, sparking widespread conversations on judicial accountability and transparency.
While the nation watches closely, the Chief Justice of India, Justice Gavai, continues to lecture on judicial practices abroad, raising questions about priorities.
Bikas Modi (Brother of Late Shri Atul Subhash) has organized a 498 KM March Against Legal Terrorism (IPC 498A) starting from Ujjain, 5 Oct 2025, against misuse of matrimonial laws (IPC 498A, CrPC 125 & others).
Legal Notices to Media and Social Platforms
Judge Reeta Kaushik, through Advocate Kshitij Tiwari, has issued legal notices to multiple media outlets, social media platforms, and tech companies. These notices aim to restrict the publication or broadcasting of any news or allegations against her in connection with Atul Subhash’s suicide case.
Platforms affected include:
- Media Houses: Aaj Tak, Dainik Jagran, Amar Ujala, ABP News
- Social Media: Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp
- Search Engines: Google
The notice specifically demands:
- Immediate halt to media trials against Judge Kaushik
- Removal of misleading or unverified content
- Preventive editorial measures to avoid future violations
Legal Framework Protecting Judges
1. Judges (Protection) Act, 1985
This act ensures that judges are shielded from baseless allegations during their tenure, emphasizing that all legal action must follow proper procedures, including a registered FIR and necessary court permissions.
“No judicial action or any allegations against judges can be entertained without prior official approval or legal authority.”
2. Broadcasting Standards Authority Guidelines (BCCC)
Media outlets are prohibited from airing baseless allegations without solid evidence.
“Any baseless allegations, photos, videos, or reports about judicial authorities without approval or valid evidence are unethical and illegal.”
3. Constitutional Protections – Article 19
- Article 19(1)(a): Protects freedom of expression
- Article 19(2): Allows reasonable restrictions to uphold judicial dignity
“The court’s respect and dignity cannot be compromised under the guise of freedom of expression.”
4. Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Section 2(c) prohibits derogatory remarks or baseless accusations against judges, with violations potentially resulting in contempt proceedings.
Supreme Court Precedents
Several judgments reinforce the sanctity of the judiciary and media responsibility:
- Harijai Singh Case (1996): Warned against unfounded allegations weakening judicial institutions
- Arundhati Roy Case (2002): Public comments defaming the judiciary amount to contempt of court
Additionally, privacy rights are protected under the Puttaswamy Judgment (2017), prohibiting unauthorized use of personal photos or videos.
ALSO READ: Denying Intimacy in Marriage: Divorce Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Explained
The notice challenges claims made in March 2024 alleging that Judge Kaushik demanded ₹5 lakh for case settlement.
“Judge Reeta Kaushik’s alleged involvement is baseless, immoral, and defamatory.”
The notice highlights that no credible evidence or FIR exists to substantiate these claims.
The directive outlines strict instructions:
- Stop ongoing media trials or unverified allegations
- Refrain from broadcasting defamatory or false content
- Remove all previously uploaded defamatory and unauthorized content
- Implement editorial measures to prevent recurrence
Non-compliance may lead to defamation claims, contempt proceedings, and other legal actions.
Read Attachment:
Click Here to Read Previous Reports on Atul Subhash Suicide