Former Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, emphasized the crucial distinction between law and justice. He stated that while the law provides a framework, true justice often emerges from social movements that shape politics and cultural understanding. His remark highlights how legal systems alone may not always ensure justice, requiring broader societal efforts.
Former Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud’s statement highlights the distinction between law and justice, emphasizing that while the law provides a framework, true justice often requires social movements, political change, and evolving cultural understanding.
Former Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, stated,
“Do not confuse law with justice. Much of the work that leads to justice within the legal system occurs outside of it, through social movements that shape politics and cultural perceptions. In our context, we need not look far to understand the distinction between law and justice.”
Also Read: Ex-CJI D Y Chandrachud: “Literature Humanizes The Law “
This impactful statement highlights an essential truth: while law is a formal system of regulations, justice frequently goes beyond legal confines. Social movements, political changes, and cultural development are vital in closing the gap between the two.
Law consists of a codified collection of principles that govern societies, maintaining order and regulation. In contrast, justice is a moral and ethical goal that seeks fairness and equality. History demonstrates that laws can sometimes be unjust, highlighting the need for social reform and activism.
The Impact of Social Movements on Law and Justice
- Civil Rights Movement (USA): Despite existing legislation, racial discrimination continued. Activism spurred legal changes, such as the Civil Rights Act.
- Women’s Rights Movements in India: Progress in gender equality laws has emerged from years of dedicated activism.
Also Read: Article 370 Was Meant To Fade Away: Ex-CJI Chandrachud Defends Supreme Court Verdict
- LGBTQ+ Rights in India: The decriminalization of Section 377 resulted from persistent social and legal advocacy.
Former CJI Chandrachud’s remarks remind us that justice is a dynamic and evolving notion. While law provides a framework, achieving justice necessitates active involvement through movements, dialogue, and reform. As society evolves, the legal system must also adapt to ensure genuine justice for everyone.
FOLLOW US FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES ON YOUTUBE
