Bombay High Court rules that Muslim personal laws cannot override a child’s welfare, granting custody to the mother in the best interest of the child.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!
MUMBAI: In a crucial judgment, the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court ruled that the welfare and well-being of a child must take precedence over the dictates of personal religious law, especially when such personal law is at odds with the child’s interests.
The decision came in First Appeal No. 348 of 2024, where the Court overturned a lower court’s order that had granted custody of a nine-year-old boy to his father based on Muslim personal law, which typically vests custody of a male child over the age of seven with the father.
Background of the Case
The case arose from a custody dispute between a separated Muslim couple, the appellant mother KSIQ from Bidar, Karnataka, and the respondent father IAQ from Nilanga, District Latur. The couple was married in October 2010, and their son was born in October 2015.
In June 2020, the mother left the matrimonial home and began living with her minor son at her parents’ residence in Bidar. Since then, she has been the primary caregiver of the child.
In 2021, the father filed a petition (Civil M.A. No. 1 of 2021) under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, before the District Judge at Nilanga, seeking custody of the minor child and a declaration of his guardianship. He claimed:
- The mother had deserted him,
- Was allegedly involved with a paramour, and
- She was unable to provide a proper environment due to her living conditions and economic status.
ALSO READ: Bombay High Court Slams Judge For Denying Urgent Hearing in Child’s Surgery Custody Case
The mother, in her defense, asserted that she:
- Was forced to leave due to domestic violence and dowry demands,
- Was running a small clothing business, and
- Was taking proper care of the child’s health, education, and emotional needs.
The trial court, after considering the evidence and briefly interacting with the child in July 2023, passed an order on December 18, 2023, granting custody to the father. The mother was allowed visitation rights only.
Challenging this decision, the mother filed a First Appeal (No. 348 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. She also faced a contempt petition (No. 715 of 2024) filed by the father for failing to comply with interim custody and visitation orders passed during the appeal proceedings.
High Court’s Observation and Final Judgment
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), presided over by Justice Shailesh P. Brahme, made a detailed assessment of both the legal and emotional dimensions of the case. The Court emphasized that
“While Muslim personal law vests custody of a male child above the age of seven with the father, Section 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 mandates that the welfare of the child is the supreme consideration, even above personal law.”
ALSO READ: Child Custody Laws in India: Legal Rights of Parents| Explained
After personally interacting with the nine-year-old child, the judge observed that the child was intelligent, emotionally attached to the mother, and had categorically refused to stay with his father.
The Court found that although the mother had failed to comply with some interim visitation and custody orders (leading to a contempt petition), this conduct did not outweigh the child’s emotional stability, comfort, and safety in her custody.
The father, despite citing personal law, failed to present evidence of a secure or emotionally suitable environment, nor did he have any female members in his household to support child-rearing. Ultimately, the Court held that when personal law is in conflict with a child’s emotional, mental, and developmental welfare, the latter must prevail. The Court said,
“When the personal law is pitted with comfort and welfare of the child, latter would have upper hand.”
Accordingly, the High Court set aside the District Judge’s order dated 18.12.2023, allowed the appeal, and granted permanent custody to the mother.
The father was granted structured visitation rights, including seven days during long school holidays and monthly supervised meetings in Bidar, under the oversight of a designated court officer. The contempt petition was left to be decided independently on its own merits.
Case Title: KSIQ versus IAQ
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.715 OF 2024
READ JUDGMENT HERE
Click Here to Read More Reports On Child Custody
FOLLOW US ON YOUTUBE FOR MORE LEGAL UPDATES
